> volunteer efforts, and we can't (and shouldn't) tell people what to

> do with their spare time. So what actually gets done depends on

> individuals and what they care about and want to get done.

This culture makes sense for a developer. But it's a very bad way to

conduct a committee. Perhaps this is where we've gone wrong here. There

is responsibility to being in this position which is a step above the

casual "care about" culture of a casual developer. People, users and

developers Depend on us, and we should not conduct ourselves with such

carelessness.