Looks very good, Martin!

I'd vote B, with the following minor remarks:

In the current redaction, "member" is first defined as someone who contributed, then the term "active member" is used for vetted member

Hence, I would

-> in Definitions, replace the first def with those two definitions:

- An Contributor is a person who is actively contributing to the Inkscape project or who has contributed to the project in the past. [1]
- An Inkscape member is a Contributor who has been added to the member list and not been removed from it

-> s/active Inkscape member/Inkscape member/ (to follow on the definitions)
-> 5b "The list of Inkscape members"
-> 4c s/contributor/Contributor (if added to the defs)

4: "members maybe" -> "member may be"
4a: s/infraction/violation/ ?

5c: remove "[3]" ([1] intended here maybe ?)

Bests,

--
Marc

Dear Leadership Committee,

As discussed; the two week consultation is finished. Thanks to everyone
who came to the meetings, commented here on the mailing list and sent
private messages. I've distilled everything down into a internal policy
document which we can now vote on.

The preference from other board members was to put this strait to a
vote since we've talked about this for a long time. So hopefully this
represents a balanced and fair membership process.

See the attached draft policy document that we are voting on here.

Ballot

 a. Adopt the internal membership policy as is.
 b. Adopt it after these minor modifications.
 c. Do not adopt this policy, or anything like it.
 d. Do something else.

Best Regards, Martin Owens

_______________________________________________
Inkscape Board of Directors mailing list -- inkscape-board@lists.inkscape.org
To unsubscribe send an email to inkscape-board-leave@lists.inkscape.org