On Jan 11, 2016 19:51, "Bryce Harrington" <bryce@...2...> wrote:
>
> Your vote is needed on the planned Inkscape Hackfest for 2016:
>
> Proposals:
>
> 1. Hold the 2016 hackfest in Leeds on Apr 11-14 2016.
> (Refer to attached proposal document for details).
>
> [ ] a. Yes, hold hackfest in Leeds as proposed
> [ ] b. Approve holding a hackfest, but recommend making the
> following alterations:
> ____________________________________________________________
> [ ] c. Do not approve holding a hackfest this year
Vote a.
> 2. Reimburse using a ranked system similar to last year, but with
> increased limits and relaxed contribution requirements, as detailed
> below.
>
> [ ] a. Use ranked reimbursement. Long term, high commit developers
> are sponsored up to a higher maximum than new developers.
> [ ] b. Use open ended. We'll fully cover all valid expenses
> incurred by the sponsorees.
> [ ] c. Other:
> ____________________________________________________________
> [ ] d. Do not reimburse for Leeds hackfest 2016 expenses
Vote a.
> 3. If a sponsoree does not hit their maximum reimbursement amount for the
> hackfest itself, can they apply the remainder against LGM expenses?
>
> [ ] Yes. Consider LGM and Hackfest expenses lumped together for
> purposes of reimbursement.
> [ ] No. Airfare can be covered by either Hackfest or LGM
> sponsorship (or split between them), but hotel and food expenses
> for each event should be handled separately.
Vote yes
> 4. The Inkscape Board sponsors a dinner event, to be funded from the
> Inkscape general fund (instead of the hackfest fund), for Hackfest
> attendees and guests.
>
> [ ] Yes. Allocate $600 from Inkscape's general fund for a dinner.
> [ ] Yes, but handle funding the dinner in a different way:
> ________________________________________________________________
> [ ] No, do not fund a sponsored dinner for the hackfest.
Vote yes / a
Best regards, Krzysztof