Hey Martin,
Do you have a link to the thread so I don't have to ask you a bunch of questions I could get answered elsewhere? :)
If at some point we're going to add any official language which could be construed as a legal statement (even if plainly worded), we should probably run it by Tony and/or Bradley at Software Freedom Conservancy since we are already a member and they advise us on all of the other similar language we use to officially represent the project. By no means am I against utilizing the SFLC for the broader goal of common language for the community, I would just personally feel better if we were to have SFC give approval before it represents our project.