On Wed, 2014-08-13 at 22:09 -0700, Bryce Harrington wrote:
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 01:47:04PM -0500, Ted Gould wrote:
> So I'd like to propose that we file the incontestability affidavits on
> the name and the logo, but not the slogan. I really like the slogan, but
> I don't think it's as important to the project overall. We should file
> maintenance on the slogan though.
> So I'd propose this motion:
> I move we file maintenance affidavits on all three marks (name, logo and
> slogan) and incontestability affidavits on the name and logo. Total
> would be $700.

We need to come to a final decision on this soon, btw.

Perhaps Jon or Mental would like to cast a vote?

Otherwise, either Ted needs to vote for Josh's proposal, or Josh and Tav
need to vote for Ted's proposal.  I'm fine any which way, but we need a
single decision.

I'm +1 on Josh's proposal, as well. Sorry, I didn't see it before I proposed one.