Marc suggested a change to the first paragraph:From: "Because of the way Inkscape is developed, the main charity fundis not used to pay programmers or other contributors to make Inkscape.Instead contributors themselves must be self-funded or purelyvolunteers. Users who wish to help fund Inkscape contributors maycontact them directly."To: "Because of the way Inkscape is developed, the main charity fund isnot used to respond to user needs, only for the general publicinterest. Instead contributors themselves can help users privately toachieve modifications and improvements through direct funding or evenbartering."
Patrick also reviewed it from the vectors channel on rocket chat, he
had a lot more issues, but suggested making sure people could be
removed for violations to the code of conduct. I've added the section
to the bottom:
"""
# Can people be removed from being listed?
The list is meant as a sort of business index of people providing
services. But if contributors violate Inkscape community code of
conduct they may be removed from this listing in the same way that they
would be removed from other parts of the website.
"""
He suggested more, an issue with making sure people are actually active
in the community. But I couldn't make anything line up with what you
were saying ted about keeping things open and not being seen to be
arbiters or guarantors. Any ideas that might suffice?