Whatever, Ted. If you can't be bothered to be part of the conversation, then don't vote. We're not required to update you on every single detail. The vote is pro or con providing stickers that people have asked for. I have no idea why this needs to be complicated when we need to order them now.

Also, for someone who clearly doesn't like "deft political moves", you sure do seem to want to make your own by blocking the majority here.

You do you, though.
-C


On Wed, Feb 15, 2023 at 7:40 PM Ted Gould <ted@gould.cx> wrote:
On Feb 15 2023, at 8:50 am, C R <cajhne@gmail.com> wrote:
Who are you accusing of being corrupt in this instance?

I would say that an action is corrupt when it involves little transparent oversight and incomplete information about what it is doing. Or when those rules are selective to one group of people. Also, a sign of corruption for me would be when votes are manipulated through peer pressure or general cajoling.

Any referendum can only be evaluated on the information in the referendum. So statements like "please take your issues up with them" and "you haven't been a part of the conversation" are just invalid.

No one should ever be encouraged to vote on something they don't understand or be discouraged from asking questions. That would be a bad culture to have.

Ted

_______________________________________________
Inkscape Board of Directors mailing list -- inkscape-board@lists.inkscape.org
To unsubscribe send an email to inkscape-board-leave@lists.inkscape.org