I've added my times. I get my 2nd vax shot on Tuesday, and I expect to be ill for the following days like I was for the last one, so Friday works best for me.
Thanks for setting this up, Pono!
-C

On Fri, Jul 2, 2021 at 4:34 PM Daniel Pono Takamori <pono@sfconservancy.org> wrote:
Here's the poll in UTC: https://framadate.org/xBJg27wbjSoOlzUk
Hopefully Tuesday-Friday next week works for people.

Thanks!

On Tue, Jun 29, 2021 at 02:27:04PM -0400, Martin Owens wrote:
> Hi Pono,
>
> It looks like Marc isn't available at the moment, so we'll have to
> proceed without his input/dates. And it looks like we've run through
> the time poll we already did.
>
> Could you set up a new poll and we'll put together a date for our
> meeting?
>
> Thanks and sorry for the delays.
>
> Best Regards, Martin Owens
>
> On Mon, 2021-06-21 at 12:59 -0700, Daniel Pono Takamori wrote:
> > The poll is UTC, sorry for not specifying.
> >
> > On Mon, Jun 21, 2021 at 03:13:50PM -0400, doctormo@gmail.com wrote:
> > > Thanks Pono,
> > >
> > > I was hoping to have Marc be able to speak up before we started
> > > planning times, but this works as it'll give us a sense for when
> > > people
> > > will be available to meet.
> > >
> > > I've filled it out with the assumption these times are in EST, let
> > > me
> > > know if it's UTC or some other timezone.
> > >
> > > The goal of the request is actually to ask for the SFC's advice for
> > > conducting meetings, to onboard/train committee members on how to
> > > conduct them. Because the Inkscape project hasn't been conducting
> > > actual meetings, it's been doing "status updates" (horribly
> > > mislabeled
> > > everywhere) so every time committee members tried to add agenda
> > > items
> > > to discuss serious business, they would be removed as not
> > > appropriate
> > > for the type of status update process that event for intended for.
> > >
> > > Now that we know that this monthly event isn't an actual committee
> > > meeting. We have an opportunity to create a real, fully developed
> > > meeting. With a discussion agenda, voting, minutes and all the
> > > parts of
> > > a meeting that many in the project really want (and thought we had,
> > > until it turned out we didn't) and your help setting that up would
> > > be
> > > great.
> > >
> > > There is a dependency chain of administrative items that we need to
> > > work through before we get to funding though, and I don't want us
> > > to
> > > start on further items until we've fixed the first items:
> > >
> > >  1. Meetings - holding actual meetings, so people have an
> > > opportunity
> > > to talk about the administration of the project and the community
> > > has a
> > > space to bring items.
> > >  2. Constituency - We have no idea who is in the inkscape
> > > community.
> > > And this is devastating to our ability to act authoritatively as
> > > EVERYTHING is stalled waiting for the mythical "inkscape community"
> > > to
> > > agree to things. But because we don't have a handle who this
> > > community
> > > is, we have no idea if we have a quorum in any particular meeting
> > > or
> > > team, or if we're reaching people. We need meetings to have the
> > > practical space to work out how this will work. SFC's guidance will
> > > be
> > > critical here.
> > >  3. Discuss and request a change of definition of the "Inkscape
> > > Community" with the SFC (update to the Agreement text) to allow...
> > >  4. Voting on a replacement member - We're currently one short, for
> > > 6
> > > months we've been unable to hold a vote because we have no idea who
> > > to
> > > send ballots to.
> > >  5. Then we can start sending information to everyone about
> > > important
> > > discussions for funding. Hopefully everyone in the Inkscape
> > > community
> > > will get a chance to be involved in this discussions and the
> > > inkscape
> > > Committee can act as gentle stewards allowing the community to work
> > > through items in confidence with our new regular meetings acting as
> > > the
> > > backbone (and contextual location) for the discussions.
> > >
> > > You can see that we have quite the list of items to work through.
> > >
> > > I believe there may be some confusion in the discussion about this
> > > being a change in the way the Inkscape Committee acts as a
> > > leadership.
> > > Or about funding. This request is not about funding, or about how
> > > "the
> > > project" makes decisions. It's just about how the committee
> > > conducts
> > > it's business and plugs back into the inkscape community so we can
> > > start being effective again.
> > >
> > > Best Regards, Martin Owens
> > >
> > > On Mon, 2021-06-21 at 11:19 -0700, Daniel Pono Takamori wrote:
> > > > Here's a poll for time gathering:
> > > > https://framadate.org/UsFcEuWf2duojI4o
> > > >
> > > > And here's a pad I made with a preliminary agenda:
> > > > https://pad.sfconservancy.org/p/Jg-a7AGFdHHpMVpICGf0
> > > >
> > > > There was some talk in the other thread about video/voice or IRC.
> > > > I
> > > > don't have
> > > > any opinion and want to make the meeting accessible to all who
> > > > need/want to
> > > > attend, so let me know if I should setup a video call link.
> > > >
> > > > -Pono
> > > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Inkscape Board of Directors mailing list --
> > > inkscape-board@lists.inkscape.org
> > > To unsubscribe send an email to
> > > inkscape-board-leave@lists.inkscape.org
> > _______________________________________________
> > Inkscape Board of Directors mailing list --
> > inkscape-board@lists.inkscape.org
> > To unsubscribe send an email to
> > inkscape-board-leave@lists.inkscape.org
> _______________________________________________
> Inkscape Board of Directors mailing list -- inkscape-board@lists.inkscape.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to inkscape-board-leave@lists.inkscape.org
_______________________________________________
Inkscape Board of Directors mailing list -- inkscape-board@lists.inkscape.org
To unsubscribe send an email to inkscape-board-leave@lists.inkscape.org