Not that it matters, but I vote C. My thoughts on the original proposal still stand and this coming up for a vote again so soon doesn't track since this is the very thing we're supposed to be having a meeting with Pono about. Am I mistaken about the purpose of the meeting that is supposed to take place (or did it happen and I missed it)? Likewise, if I'm not mistaken, Martin even brought it up at the last PLC meeting.

Cheers,
Josh

On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 12:01 PM Marc Jeanmougin <marc@jeanmougin.fr> wrote:
Dear PLC,

*Background:*
Jonathan Neuhauser (@joneuhauser at Gitlab and chat.inkscape.org) is
submitting a proposal to hire two core developers for the equivalent of
a month of work each to fix bugs and regressions during the remaining
time until the 1.3 release. This proposal is a slightly changed version
of the one voted on in December; with the main change that one
contractor was removed to take into account PLC member remarks asking
for a smaller scale first attempt.

The complete proposal is appended; it contains all the details on the
selection process, persons, objectives as well as a remark on why the
Dev team asserts the opinion that at least two contractors should be
hired for this project.

*Proposal:*

Voting is needed on the following items:

- hiring Rafal Siejakowski and Martin Owens as contractors during the
bugfixing season in order to fix known bugs before 1.3 is released,

- allocating a total of USD 22,400 as compensation for the two contractors.

Details on the process are lined out in the attached document.

*Ballot:*

a. Accept the above items.
b. No, cease effort for Bugfix Accelerator 2023
c. Other: ______

Best regards,

--
Mc
_______________________________________________
Inkscape Board of Directors mailing list -- inkscape-board@lists.inkscape.org
To unsubscribe send an email to inkscape-board-leave@lists.inkscape.org