Dear PLC,
the developer team requests to repeat the sucessful 2023 Bugfix accelerator program in 2024 with a few upgrades as discussed in last week's developer meeting.
Background: see attached document, but to give you a summary of the changes:
*
No fixed list of contractors at the time of the vote; instead Call for applications like with the GTK4 internal contractor + hiring team.
*
Scenario of a contractor dropping out is explicitly covered; extension for the 1.4.x release series contained in the proposal.
*
Clarification that the selection of issues to work on is done primarily by the project.
*
Simplification of contract section.
As for other major expenses from contracting in 2024, my grants proposal is still awaiting SFC review.
Ballot:
a) Repeat the bugfix accelerator program under the conditions outlined in the proposal; allocate USD 20'000 to it.
b) No bugfix accelerator program in 2024.
c) Other: ______
Best regards, Jonathan ___________________
Hi Jonathan,
The changes look good to me.
Although I would vote a. I believe I should abstain in order to be able to participate in the program.
Best Regards, Martin Owens
On Tue, 2024-01-30 at 20:15 +0100, Jonathan Neuhauser wrote:
Dear PLC, the developer team requests to repeat the sucessful 2023 Bugfix accelerator program in 2024 with a few upgrades as discussed in last week's developer meeting. Background: see attached document, but to give you a summary of the changes: * No fixed list of contractors at the time of the vote; instead Call for applications like with the GTK4 internal contractor + hiring team. * Scenario of a contractor dropping out is explicitly covered; extension for the 1.4.x release series contained in the proposal. * Clarification that the selection of issues to work on is done primarily by the project. * Simplification of contract section. As for other major expenses from contracting in 2024, my grants proposal is still awaiting SFC review. Ballot: a) Repeat the bugfix accelerator program under the conditions outlined in the proposal; allocate USD 20'000 to it. b) No bugfix accelerator program in 2024. c) Other: ______ Best regards, Jonathan ___________________ _______________________________________________ Inkscape Board of Directors mailing list -- inkscape-board@lists.inkscape.org To unsubscribe send an email to inkscape-board-leave@lists.inkscape.org
Thanks for the work Jonathan!
I vote (a)
On 30/01/2024 20:15, Jonathan Neuhauser wrote:
Dear PLC,
the developer team requests to repeat the sucessful 2023 Bugfix accelerator program in 2024 with a few upgrades as discussed in last week's developer meeting.
Background: see attached document, but to give you a summary of the changes:
No fixed list of contractors at the time of the vote; instead Call for applications like with the GTK4 internal contractor + hiring team.
Scenario of a contractor dropping out is explicitly covered; extension for the 1.4.x release series contained in the proposal.
Clarification that the selection of issues to work on is done primarily by the project.
Simplification of contract section.
As for other major expenses from contracting in 2024, my grants proposal is still awaiting SFC review.
Ballot:
a) Repeat the bugfix accelerator program under the conditions outlined in the proposal; allocate USD 20'000 to it.
b) No bugfix accelerator program in 2024.
c) Other: ______
Best regards, Jonathan ___________________
Inkscape Board of Directors mailing list --inkscape-board@lists.inkscape.org To unsubscribe send an email toinkscape-board-leave@lists.inkscape.org
Thank you, Jonathan!
I vote a.
René
Am 30.01.2024 um 20:15 schrieb Jonathan Neuhauser jonathan.neuhauser@outlook.com:
Dear PLC,
the developer team requests to repeat the sucessful 2023 Bugfix accelerator program in 2024 with a few upgrades as discussed in last week's developer meeting.
Background: see attached document, but to give you a summary of the changes:
No fixed list of contractors at the time of the vote; instead Call for applications like with the GTK4 internal contractor + hiring team.
Scenario of a contractor dropping out is explicitly covered; extension for the 1.4.x release series contained in the proposal.
Clarification that the selection of issues to work on is done primarily by the project.
Simplification of contract section.
As for other major expenses from contracting in 2024, my grants proposal is still awaiting SFC review.
Ballot:
a) Repeat the bugfix accelerator program under the conditions outlined in the proposal; allocate USD 20'000 to it.
b) No bugfix accelerator program in 2024.
c) Other: ______
Best regards, Jonathan ___________________
<Bugfix Accelerator 2024.pdf>_______________________________________________ Inkscape Board of Directors mailing list -- inkscape-board@lists.inkscape.org mailto:inkscape-board@lists.inkscape.org To unsubscribe send an email to inkscape-board-leave@lists.inkscape.org mailto:inkscape-board-leave@lists.inkscape.org
I abstain as I will probably apply.
----- Original Message ----- | From: "Jonathan Neuhauser" jonathan.neuhauser@outlook.com | To: "Inkscape Board" inkscape-board@lists.inkscape.org | Sent: Tuesday, January 30, 2024 8:15:10 PM | Subject: [Inkscape-board] [VOTE] Bugfix accelerator 2024 | | | | | Dear PLC, | | | the developer team requests to repeat the sucessful 2023 Bugfix | accelerator program in 2024 with a few upgrades as discussed in last | week's developer meeting. | | Background: see attached document, but to give you a summary of the | changes: | | | | | * | | No fixed list of contractors at the time of the vote; instead Call | for applications like with the GTK4 internal contractor + hiring | team. | * | | Scenario of a contractor dropping out is explicitly covered; | extension for the 1.4.x release series contained in the proposal. | * | | Clarification that the selection of issues to work on is done | primarily by the project. | * | | Simplification of contract section. | | | As for other major expenses from contracting in 2024, my grants | proposal is still awaiting SFC review. | | | Ballot: | | a) Repeat the bugfix accelerator program under the conditions | outlined in the proposal; allocate USD 20'000 to it. | | b) No bugfix accelerator program in 2024. | | c) Other: ______ | | Best regards, | Jonathan | ___________________ | _______________________________________________ | Inkscape Board of Directors mailing list -- | inkscape-board@lists.inkscape.org | To unsubscribe send an email to | inkscape-board-leave@lists.inkscape.org |
Vote A.
I don't think that people that are going to apply need to abstain, that's the point of having the hiring committee in this case. We're effectively just creating the committee and giving them a budget, they're given the decision making authority. Ted On Jan 30 2024, at 1:15 pm, Jonathan Neuhauser jonathan.neuhauser@outlook.com wrote:
Dear PLC,
the developer team requests to repeat the sucessful 2023 Bugfix accelerator program in 2024 with a few upgrades as discussed in last week's developer meeting. Background: see attached document, but to give you a summary of the changes:
No fixed list of contractors at the time of the vote; instead Call for applications like with the GTK4 internal contractor + hiring team. Scenario of a contractor dropping out is explicitly covered; extension for the 1.4.x release series contained in the proposal.
Clarification that the selection of issues to work on is done primarily by the project.
Simplification of contract section.
As for other major expenses from contracting in 2024, my grants proposal is still awaiting SFC review.
Ballot: a) Repeat the bugfix accelerator program under the conditions outlined in the proposal; allocate USD 20'000 to it. b) No bugfix accelerator program in 2024. c) Other: ______ Best regards, Jonathan ___________________
Inkscape Board of Directors mailing list -- inkscape-board@lists.inkscape.org To unsubscribe send an email to inkscape-board-leave@lists.inkscape.org
In that case I vote A.
Thanks for the clarification Ted.
On Fri, 2 Feb 2024 at 17:39, Ted Gould ted@gould.cx wrote:
Vote A.
I don't think that people that are going to apply need to abstain, that's the point of having the hiring committee in this case. We're effectively just creating the committee and giving them a budget, they're given the decision making authority.
Ted
On Jan 30 2024, at 1:15 pm, Jonathan Neuhauser < jonathan.neuhauser@outlook.com> wrote:
Dear PLC,
the developer team requests to repeat the sucessful 2023 Bugfix accelerator program in 2024 with a few upgrades as discussed in last week's developer meeting.
Background: see attached document, but to give you a summary of the changes:
- No fixed list of contractors at the time of the vote; instead Call
for applications like with the GTK4 internal contractor + hiring team.
- Scenario of a contractor dropping out is explicitly covered;
extension for the 1.4.x release series contained in the proposal.
- Clarification that the selection of issues to work on is done
primarily by the project.
- Simplification of contract section.
As for other major expenses from contracting in 2024, my grants proposal is still awaiting SFC review.
Ballot:
a) Repeat the bugfix accelerator program under the conditions outlined in the proposal; allocate USD 20'000 to it.
b) No bugfix accelerator program in 2024.
c) Other: ______
Best regards, Jonathan ___________________ _______________________________________________ Inkscape Board of Directors mailing list -- inkscape-board@lists.inkscape.org To unsubscribe send an email to inkscape-board-leave@lists.inkscape.org
Inkscape Board of Directors mailing list -- inkscape-board@lists.inkscape.org To unsubscribe send an email to inkscape-board-leave@lists.inkscape.org
I vote A.
On Tue, Jan 30, 2024 at 11:15 AM Jonathan Neuhauser < jonathan.neuhauser@outlook.com> wrote:
Dear PLC,
the developer team requests to repeat the sucessful 2023 Bugfix accelerator program in 2024 with a few upgrades as discussed in last week's developer meeting.
Background: see attached document, but to give you a summary of the changes:
No fixed list of contractors at the time of the vote; instead Call for applications like with the GTK4 internal contractor + hiring team.
Scenario of a contractor dropping out is explicitly covered; extension for the 1.4.x release series contained in the proposal.
Clarification that the selection of issues to work on is done primarily by the project.
Simplification of contract section.
As for other major expenses from contracting in 2024, my grants proposal is still awaiting SFC review.
Ballot:
a) Repeat the bugfix accelerator program under the conditions outlined in the proposal; allocate USD 20'000 to it.
b) No bugfix accelerator program in 2024.
c) Other: ______
Best regards, Jonathan ___________________ _______________________________________________ Inkscape Board of Directors mailing list -- inkscape-board@lists.inkscape.org To unsubscribe send an email to inkscape-board-leave@lists.inkscape.org
Dear all, I also vote a. Thanks for voting. The vote passes unanimously with 2 abstentions.
Summary: Jonathan Neuhauser - A Josh Andler - A Marc Jeanmougin - A Martin Owens - Abstain René de Hesselle - A Tavmjong Bah - Abstain Ted Gould - A
Marc and I will discuss the next steps and send out the call for applications. Have fun at FOSDEM!
Best regards Jonathan
Am 02.02.2024 um 23:57 schrieb Josh Andler scislac@gmail.com:
I vote A.
On Tue, Jan 30, 2024 at 11:15 AM Jonathan Neuhauser <jonathan.neuhauser@outlook.commailto:jonathan.neuhauser@outlook.com> wrote:
Dear PLC,
the developer team requests to repeat the sucessful 2023 Bugfix accelerator program in 2024 with a few upgrades as discussed in last week's developer meeting.
Background: see attached document, but to give you a summary of the changes:
* No fixed list of contractors at the time of the vote; instead Call for applications like with the GTK4 internal contractor + hiring team.
* Scenario of a contractor dropping out is explicitly covered; extension for the 1.4.x release series contained in the proposal.
* Clarification that the selection of issues to work on is done primarily by the project.
* Simplification of contract section.
As for other major expenses from contracting in 2024, my grants proposal is still awaiting SFC review.
Ballot:
a) Repeat the bugfix accelerator program under the conditions outlined in the proposal; allocate USD 20'000 to it.
b) No bugfix accelerator program in 2024.
c) Other: ______
Best regards, Jonathan ___________________
_______________________________________________ Inkscape Board of Directors mailing list -- inkscape-board@lists.inkscape.orgmailto:inkscape-board@lists.inkscape.org To unsubscribe send an email to inkscape-board-leave@lists.inkscape.orgmailto:inkscape-board-leave@lists.inkscape.org
participants (8)
-
doctormo＠gmail.com -
Jonathan Neuhauser -
Josh Andler -
Marc Jeanmougin -
Martin Owens
-
René de Hesselle -
tavmjong＠free.fr -
Ted Gould