3:13 a.m.
On Dec 4th, 2015 we met to discuss the following items:
Budget 2016
Hackfest 2016: Leeds
Funded development
Licensing
Action items:
√ Post meeting minutes [bryce]
√ New agenda for next month [bryce]
* Ensure KK and Alex discuss sponsor recognition [Tav]
* Invite Alex to make a proposal for Leeds [bryce]
* Get Project Suggestions list ready for GSoC [bryce]
* Draft budget [bryce]
* Do a vote for another OSUOSL donation [bryce]
Some other topics we wanted to discuss (but lacked the right people):
Sponsorship levels
Code of Conduct & Privacy Policy
GSoC 2016
C++11
Licensing issues (GPL v2+)
For details of our meeting please see:
https://inkscape.org/en/gallery/item/7056/
Our next meeting will be held January 8th, 2016.
Bryce
From: inkscape-board-request(a)lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: confirm 11339c53f676616da863412bd91937fba974b335
If you reply to this message, keeping the Subject: header intact,
Mailman will discard the held message. Do this if the message is
spam. If you reply to this message and include an Approved: header
with the list password in it, the message will be approved for posting
to the list. The Approved: header can also appear in the first line
of the body of the reply.
3:33 a.m.
8 дек. 2015 г. 14:13 пользователь "Bryce Harrington" написал:
On Dec 4th, 2015 we met to discuss the following items:
Budget 2016
Hackfest 2016: Leeds
Funded development
An outsider's question: is the lack of web infrastructure the only
roadblock to get funded development started?
Alex
12:53 p.m.
On Tue, Dec 08, 2015 at 02:33:08PM +0300, Alexandre Prokoudine wrote:
8 дек. 2015 г. 14:13 пользователь "Bryce Harrington"
написал:
>
> On Dec 4th, 2015 we met to discuss the following items:
>
> Budget 2016
> Hackfest 2016: Leeds
> Funded development
An outsider's question: is the lack of web infrastructure the only
roadblock to get funded development started?
Yep.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Go from Idea to Many App Stores Faster with Intel(R) XDK
Give your users amazing mobile app experiences with Intel(R) XDK.
Use one codebase in this all-in-one HTML5 development environment.
Design, debug & build mobile apps & 2D/3D high-impact games for multiple OSs.
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=254741911&iu=/4140
_______________________________________________
Inkscape-board mailing list
Inkscape-board(a)lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/inkscape-board
4:54 p.m.
On Tue, Dec 08, 2015 at 06:57:42PM -0500, Martin Owens wrote:
On Tue, 2015-12-08 at 12:53 -0800, Bryce Harrington wrote:
> Yep.
Do you have a branch you're working on? I'd like to pitch in as you go.
Yeah I can set one up.
Right now I'm mostly working out design details - what interfaces do we
need, what data should they present, what should they link to, and so
on. I'm capturing this thinking on the wiki here, and would welcome
collaboration on this:
http://wiki.inkscape.org/wiki/index.php/FundedProjectSystemDevelopment
There are two near term goals I have in mind.
First is to enable people to sign up for the funded projects, which is
the most important functionality we need in order to start using the
system; the WorkerApplicationForm is high on the todo list for this
goal. I suppose we could get by without the rest of the system if we at
least had this piece functioning.
Second is to display a listing of project ideas for GSoC 2016, which
kicks off in Feb. This can be done with a subset of the overall
functionality, and it's a pretty core subset, so I think this is a
useful objective (plus gives me a tight deadline). The data that this
needs pretty much overlaps what we need for the general funded project
system, but there might be a few GSoC-specific items (like mentor
name(s)).
Rather than shoehorn that into the Project object, I'm thinking of
splitting out a separate object, and allow Projects to have multiple of
these objects. If a project is listed for GSoC 2016, 2017, and 2018 we
could have three different sets of mentors. And potentially there could
be per-GSoC year state info, such as it was attempted in 2016 but
failed, in 2017 the applicants weren't accepted, and in 2018 it was
accepted and completed successfully.
We could also have objects for the regular funded efforts too. I could
imagine for a given project there could potentially be several failed
efforts before someone completes it successfully. We have different
kinds of data to track for regular funded efforts vs. GSoC, so maybe we
one class for the GSoC data and another for the other both subclasses of
an abstract Job class. And a Project could own an arbitrary number of
objects of either class.
But here's my question... while this is a typical OOP architecture it
exceeds my limited Django-fu, so I'm uncertain whether this is feasible
to model in Django or is going to make things too complicated. What do
you think?
Bryce
7:41 p.m.
On Tue, 2015-12-08 at 16:54 -0800, Bryce Harrington wrote:
But here's my question... while this is a typical OOP
architecture it
exceeds my limited Django-fu, so I'm uncertain whether this is
feasible
to model in Django or is going to make things too complicated. What
do you think?
It's certainly possible. But like any large ideal set of
functionalities, it's best to start with the steps to get there. You can
always design your database tables first and if you need help putting
that into django, let me know. Forms, admins and the rest can also be
helped with.
Martin,
2917
days inactive
2918
days old
inkscape-board@lists.inkscape.org
5 comments
3 participants
participants (3)
-
Alexandre Prokoudine -
Bryce Harrington -
Martin Owens