4:21 p.m.
[Resending to the correct list this time... sheesh.]
----- Forwarded message from Bryce Harrington <bryce@...2...> -----
Date: Sun, 15 May 2016 23:14:31 -0700
From: Bryce Harrington <bryce@...2...>
To: inkscape-devel@...5...
Subject: [Inkscape-devel] [REFERENDUM] SVG Working Group Meetings for 2016
A majority vote of the current board members is required for the
following matter.
Proposal:
Authorize SVG WG travel by Tav up to the amount in the SVG WG fund.
"Inkscape's Project Leadership committee authorizes Conservancy to pay
any invoice from Tav between 2016-03-01 and 2017-02-28 for SVG Working
Group meetings, up to the amount presently available in Inkscape's SVG
WG Fund, $2384.91. Tav must of course also comply with Conservancy's
travel policy."
[ ] a. Yes, authorize SVG WG expenses up to amount in fund
[ ] b. No, do not authorize these expenses
Votes:
Resolved:
Background:
In the past we've had to vote on each of Tav's meeting attendances on a
case by case basis. But now that we have set aside a fund specifically
for these meetings, I think we should just approve any and all travel he
may do, up to the total in that fund. This will eliminate uncertainty
for him in making his travel plans, and simplify our voting.
I enquired with Bradley Kuhn about how we can do this, and this is what
he replied:
<quote>
Bryce Harrington wrote:
Tav attends these SVG WG meetings pretty routinely now, and I
don't
recall us ever not approving his attendance. Now that we have a
dedicated fund set up for this, that isn't going to be used for
anything *but* funding Tav's SVG WG trips, would it be permissible to
give him approval to arrange his attendance at these meetings at his
own discretion, so long as the expenses are within the limit of what's
in the funding pool, without requiring board votes on each individual
meeting?
I'd suggest you approve an annual maximum budget that Tav can send
invoices for regarding SVG meetings, and instruct Conservancy to pay
them provided Tav's within the Conservancy travel policy. That way, you
only have to think about it once per year, or when he goes over budget.
Something like:
"Inkscape's Project Leadership committee authorizes Conservancy to pay
any invoice from Tav between now and 2017-01-01 for SVG Working Group
meetings, up to a maximum 2016 Travel Budget for Tav's SVG Working
Group meetings of $Nk. Tav must of course also comply with
Conservancy's travel policy."
-- bkuhn
<endquote>
I aligned the dates to fiscal year 2016 since we decided to shift our
budget to those dates.
Below is a tally of the SVG WG fund balance as of what's in SFC's ledger
system for us:
---- FY 2015 ----
Initial fund $ 0
+ $2250.00 Budgeted from Inkscape General Fund 2015 $ 2250
- $ 346.82 SVG WG Sweden $ 1903.18
- $ 12.89 " " $ 1890.29
- $ 12.95 " " $ 1877.34
- $ 37.24 " " $ 1840.10
- $ 15.19 " " $ 1824.91
- $ 49.53 " " $ 1775.38
- $ 394.00 " " $ 1381.38
- $ 31.38 " " $ 1350.00
+ $2250.00 Retroactive from FY 2016 Ink. Gen. Fund $ 3600.00
- $ 12.99 SVG WG Sydney Feb 3-5 $ 3587.01
- $ 12.44 " " $ 3574.57
- $1586.80 " " $ 1987.77
- $ 15.55 " " $ 1972.22
- $ 11.67 " " $ 1960.55
- $ 244.29 " " $ 1716.26
- $ 68.89 " " $ 1647.37
---- FY 2016 ----
+ $ 736.54 Donation income Dec 2015 - May 2016 $ 2383.91
This will cover Tav's recent London SVG editor's meeting (which he
reports ran to about $500), an editor's meeting in Amsterdam, and other
travel he'll undertake through the remainder of FY 2016.
If Tav needs to spend in excess of this sum, and there have been
additional donation income that covers the overage, at that point
we'll need to re-vote to increase the budget limit.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mobile security can be enabling, not merely restricting. Employees who
bring their own devices (BYOD) to work are irked by the imposition of MDM
restrictions. Mobile Device Manager Plus allows you to control only the
apps on BYO-devices by containerizing them, leaving personal data untouched!
https://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/304595813;131938128;j
_______________________________________________
Inkscape-devel mailing list
Inkscape-devel(a)lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/inkscape-devel
----- End forwarded message -----
5:12 p.m.
Still a. :-D
On Mon, 2016-05-16 at 09:21 -0700, Bryce Harrington wrote:
[Resending to the correct list this time... sheesh.]
----- Forwarded message from Bryce Harrington <bryce@...131...
org> -----
Date: Sun, 15 May 2016 23:14:31 -0700
From: Bryce Harrington <bryce@...2...>
To: inkscape-devel@...5...
Subject: [Inkscape-devel] [REFERENDUM] SVG Working Group Meetings for
2016
A majority vote of the current board members is required for the
following matter.
Proposal:
Authorize SVG WG travel by Tav up to the amount in the SVG WG fund.
"Inkscape's Project Leadership committee authorizes Conservancy to
pay
any invoice from Tav between 2016-03-01 and 2017-02-28 for SVG
Working
Group meetings, up to the amount presently available in Inkscape's
SVG
WG Fund, $2384.91. Tav must of course also comply with
Conservancy's
travel policy."
[ ] a. Yes, authorize SVG WG expenses up to amount in fund
[ ] b. No, do not authorize these expenses
Votes:
Resolved:
Background:
In the past we've had to vote on each of Tav's meeting attendances on
a
case by case basis. But now that we have set aside a fund
specifically
for these meetings, I think we should just approve any and all travel
he
may do, up to the total in that fund. This will eliminate
uncertainty
for him in making his travel plans, and simplify our voting.
I enquired with Bradley Kuhn about how we can do this, and this is
what
he replied:
<quote>
Bryce Harrington wrote:
>
> Tav attends these SVG WG meetings pretty routinely now, and I don't
> recall us ever not approving his attendance. Now that we have a
> dedicated fund set up for this, that isn't going to be used for
> anything *but* funding Tav's SVG WG trips, would it be permissible
> to
> give him approval to arrange his attendance at these meetings at
> his
> own discretion, so long as the expenses are within the limit of
> what's
> in the funding pool, without requiring board votes on each
> individual
> meeting?
I'd suggest you approve an annual maximum budget that Tav can send
invoices for regarding SVG meetings, and instruct Conservancy to pay
them provided Tav's within the Conservancy travel policy. That way,
you
only have to think about it once per year, or when he goes over
budget.
Something like:
"Inkscape's Project Leadership committee authorizes Conservancy to
pay
any invoice from Tav between now and 2017-01-01 for SVG Working
Group
meetings, up to a maximum 2016 Travel Budget for Tav's SVG Working
Group meetings of $Nk. Tav must of course also comply with
Conservancy's travel policy."
-- bkuhn
<endquote>
I aligned the dates to fiscal year 2016 since we decided to shift our
budget to those dates.
Below is a tally of the SVG WG fund balance as of what's in SFC's
ledger
system for us:
---- FY 2015 ----
Initial fund $ 0
+ $2250.00 Budgeted from Inkscape General Fund 2015 $ 2250
- $ 346.82 SVG WG Sweden $ 1903.18
- $ 12.89 " " $ 1890.29
- $ 12.95 " " $ 1877.34
- $ 37.24 " " $ 1840.10
- $ 15.19 " " $ 1824.91
- $ 49.53 " " $ 1775.38
- $ 394.00 " " $ 1381.38
- $ 31.38 " " $ 1350.00
+ $2250.00 Retroactive from FY 2016 Ink. Gen. Fund $ 3600.00
- $ 12.99 SVG WG Sydney Feb 3-5 $ 3587.01
- $ 12.44 " " $ 3574.57
- $1586.80 " " $ 1987.77
- $ 15.55 " " $ 1972.22
- $ 11.67 " " $ 1960.55
- $ 244.29 " " $ 1716.26
- $ 68.89 " " $ 1647.37
---- FY 2016 ----
+ $ 736.54 Donation income Dec 2015 - May 2016 $ 2383.91
This will cover Tav's recent London SVG editor's meeting (which he
reports ran to about $500), an editor's meeting in Amsterdam, and
other
travel he'll undertake through the remainder of FY 2016.
If Tav needs to spend in excess of this sum, and there have been
additional donation income that covers the overage, at that point
we'll need to re-vote to increase the budget limit.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------
Mobile security can be enabling, not merely restricting. Employees
who
bring their own devices (BYOD) to work are irked by the imposition of
MDM
restrictions. Mobile Device Manager Plus allows you to control only
the
apps on BYO-devices by containerizing them, leaving personal data
untouched!
https://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/304595813;131938128;j
_______________________________________________
Inkscape-devel mailing list
Inkscape-devel(a)lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/inkscape-devel
----- End forwarded message -----
-------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------
Mobile security can be enabling, not merely restricting. Employees
who
bring their own devices (BYOD) to work are irked by the imposition of
MDM
restrictions. Mobile Device Manager Plus allows you to control only
the
apps on BYO-devices by containerizing them, leaving personal data
untouched!
https://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/304595813;131938128;j
_______________________________________________
Inkscape-board mailing list
Inkscape-board(a)lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/inkscape-board
6:25 p.m.
New subject: [REFERENDUM] SVG Working Group Meetings for 2016
Vote a, of course - keep up the fantastic work Tav!
On May 16, 2016 10:12, "Martin Owens" <doctormo@...23...> wrote:
Still a. :-D
On Mon, 2016-05-16 at 09:21 -0700, Bryce Harrington wrote:
> [Resending to the correct list this time... sheesh.]
>
> ----- Forwarded message from Bryce Harrington <bryce@...131...
> org> -----
>
> Date: Sun, 15 May 2016 23:14:31 -0700
> From: Bryce Harrington <bryce@...2...>
> To: inkscape-devel@...5...
> Subject: [Inkscape-devel] [REFERENDUM] SVG Working Group Meetings for
> 2016
>
> A majority vote of the current board members is required for the
> following matter.
>
> Proposal:
>
> Authorize SVG WG travel by Tav up to the amount in the SVG WG fund.
>
> "Inkscape's Project Leadership committee authorizes Conservancy to
> pay
> any invoice from Tav between 2016-03-01 and 2017-02-28 for SVG
> Working
> Group meetings, up to the amount presently available in Inkscape's
> SVG
> WG Fund, $2384.91. Tav must of course also comply with
> Conservancy's
> travel policy."
>
> [ ] a. Yes, authorize SVG WG expenses up to amount in fund
> [ ] b. No, do not authorize these expenses
>
> Votes:
>
>
> Resolved:
>
>
> Background:
>
> In the past we've had to vote on each of Tav's meeting attendances on
> a
> case by case basis. But now that we have set aside a fund
> specifically
> for these meetings, I think we should just approve any and all travel
> he
> may do, up to the total in that fund. This will eliminate
> uncertainty
> for him in making his travel plans, and simplify our voting.
>
> I enquired with Bradley Kuhn about how we can do this, and this is
> what
> he replied:
>
>
> <quote>
> Bryce Harrington wrote:
> >
> > Tav attends these SVG WG meetings pretty routinely now, and I don't
> > recall us ever not approving his attendance. Now that we have a
> > dedicated fund set up for this, that isn't going to be used for
> > anything *but* funding Tav's SVG WG trips, would it be permissible
> > to
> > give him approval to arrange his attendance at these meetings at
> > his
> > own discretion, so long as the expenses are within the limit of
> > what's
> > in the funding pool, without requiring board votes on each
> > individual
> > meeting?
> I'd suggest you approve an annual maximum budget that Tav can send
> invoices for regarding SVG meetings, and instruct Conservancy to pay
> them provided Tav's within the Conservancy travel policy. That way,
> you
> only have to think about it once per year, or when he goes over
> budget.
> Something like:
>
> "Inkscape's Project Leadership committee authorizes Conservancy to
> pay
> any invoice from Tav between now and 2017-01-01 for SVG Working
> Group
> meetings, up to a maximum 2016 Travel Budget for Tav's SVG Working
> Group meetings of $Nk. Tav must of course also comply with
> Conservancy's travel policy."
>
> -- bkuhn
> <endquote>
>
>
> I aligned the dates to fiscal year 2016 since we decided to shift our
> budget to those dates.
>
> Below is a tally of the SVG WG fund balance as of what's in SFC's
> ledger
> system for us:
>
> ---- FY 2015 ----
> Initial fund $ 0
> + $2250.00 Budgeted from Inkscape General Fund 2015 $ 2250
> - $ 346.82 SVG WG Sweden $ 1903.18
> - $ 12.89 " " $ 1890.29
> - $ 12.95 " " $ 1877.34
> - $ 37.24 " " $ 1840.10
> - $ 15.19 " " $ 1824.91
> - $ 49.53 " " $ 1775.38
> - $ 394.00 " " $ 1381.38
> - $ 31.38 " " $ 1350.00
> + $2250.00 Retroactive from FY 2016 Ink. Gen. Fund $ 3600.00
> - $ 12.99 SVG WG Sydney Feb 3-5 $ 3587.01
> - $ 12.44 " " $ 3574.57
> - $1586.80 " " $ 1987.77
> - $ 15.55 " " $ 1972.22
> - $ 11.67 " " $ 1960.55
> - $ 244.29 " " $ 1716.26
> - $ 68.89 " " $ 1647.37
>
> ---- FY 2016 ----
> + $ 736.54 Donation income Dec 2015 - May 2016 $ 2383.91
>
> This will cover Tav's recent London SVG editor's meeting (which he
> reports ran to about $500), an editor's meeting in Amsterdam, and
> other
> travel he'll undertake through the remainder of FY 2016.
>
> If Tav needs to spend in excess of this sum, and there have been
> additional donation income that covers the overage, at that point
> we'll need to re-vote to increase the budget limit.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
> -----------
> Mobile security can be enabling, not merely restricting. Employees
> who
> bring their own devices (BYOD) to work are irked by the imposition of
> MDM
> restrictions. Mobile Device Manager Plus allows you to control only
> the
> apps on BYO-devices by containerizing them, leaving personal data
> untouched!
> https://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/304595813;131938128;j
> _______________________________________________
> Inkscape-devel mailing list
> Inkscape-devel(a)lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/inkscape-devel
>
> ----- End forwarded message -----
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
> -----------
> Mobile security can be enabling, not merely restricting. Employees
> who
> bring their own devices (BYOD) to work are irked by the imposition of
> MDM
> restrictions. Mobile Device Manager Plus allows you to control only
> the
> apps on BYO-devices by containerizing them, leaving personal data
> untouched!
> https://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/304595813;131938128;j
> _______________________________________________
> Inkscape-board mailing list
> Inkscape-board(a)lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/inkscape-board
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mobile security can be enabling, not merely restricting. Employees who
bring their own devices (BYOD) to work are irked by the imposition of MDM
restrictions. Mobile Device Manager Plus allows you to control only the
apps on BYO-devices by containerizing them, leaving personal data
untouched!
https://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/304595813;131938128;j
_______________________________________________
Inkscape-board mailing list
Inkscape-board(a)lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/inkscape-board
7:14 p.m.
Vote a.
Ted
On Mon, 2016-05-16 at 09:21 -0700, Bryce Harrington wrote:
[Resending to the correct list this time... sheesh.]
----- Forwarded message from Bryce Harrington
org> -----
Date: Sun, 15 May 2016 23:14:31 -0700
>
> From: Bryce Harrington <bryce@...2...>
To: inkscape-devel@...5...
Subject: [Inkscape-devel] [REFERENDUM] SVG Working Group Meetings for
2016
A majority vote of the current board members is required for the
following matter.
Proposal:
Authorize SVG WG travel by Tav up to the amount in the SVG WG fund.
"Inkscape's Project Leadership committee authorizes Conservancy to
pay
any invoice from Tav between 2016-03-01 and 2017-02-28 for SVG
Working
Group meetings, up to the amount presently available in Inkscape's
SVG
WG Fund, $2384.91. Tav must of course also comply with
Conservancy's
travel policy."
[ ] a. Yes, authorize SVG WG expenses up to amount in fund
[ ] b. No, do not authorize these expenses
Votes:
Resolved:
Background:
In the past we've had to vote on each of Tav's meeting attendances on
a
case by case basis. But now that we have set aside a fund
specifically
for these meetings, I think we should just approve any and all travel
he
may do, up to the total in that fund. This will eliminate
uncertainty
for him in making his travel plans, and simplify our voting.
I enquired with Bradley Kuhn about how we can do this, and this is
what
he replied:
<quote>
Bryce Harrington wrote:
>
> Tav attends these SVG WG meetings pretty routinely now, and I don't
> recall us ever not approving his attendance. Now that we have a
> dedicated fund set up for this, that isn't going to be used for
> anything *but* funding Tav's SVG WG trips, would it be permissible
> to
> give him approval to arrange his attendance at these meetings at
> his
> own discretion, so long as the expenses are within the limit of
> what's
> in the funding pool, without requiring board votes on each
> individual
> meeting?
I'd suggest you approve an annual maximum budget that Tav can send
invoices for regarding SVG meetings, and instruct Conservancy to pay
them provided Tav's within the Conservancy travel policy. That way,
you
only have to think about it once per year, or when he goes over
budget.
Something like:
"Inkscape's Project Leadership committee authorizes Conservancy to
pay
any invoice from Tav between now and 2017-01-01 for SVG Working
Group
meetings, up to a maximum 2016 Travel Budget for Tav's SVG Working
Group meetings of $Nk. Tav must of course also comply with
Conservancy's travel policy."
-- bkuhn
<endquote>
I aligned the dates to fiscal year 2016 since we decided to shift our
budget to those dates.
Below is a tally of the SVG WG fund balance as of what's in SFC's
ledger
system for us:
---- FY 2015 ----
Initial fund $ 0
+ $2250.00 Budgeted from Inkscape General Fund 2015 $ 2250
- $ 346.82 SVG WG Sweden $ 1903.18
- $ 12.89 " " $ 1890.29
- $ 12.95 " " $ 1877.34
- $ 37.24 " " $ 1840.10
- $ 15.19 " " $ 1824.91
- $ 49.53 " " $ 1775.38
- $ 394.00 " " $ 1381.38
- $ 31.38 " " $ 1350.00
+ $2250.00 Retroactive from FY 2016 Ink. Gen. Fund $ 3600.00
- $ 12.99 SVG WG Sydney Feb 3-5 $ 3587.01
- $ 12.44 " " $ 3574.57
- $1586.80 " " $ 1987.77
- $ 15.55 " " $ 1972.22
- $ 11.67 " " $ 1960.55
- $ 244.29 " " $ 1716.26
- $ 68.89 " " $ 1647.37
---- FY 2016 ----
+ $ 736.54 Donation income Dec 2015 - May 2016 $ 2383.91
This will cover Tav's recent London SVG editor's meeting (which he
reports ran to about $500), an editor's meeting in Amsterdam, and
other
travel he'll undertake through the remainder of FY 2016.
If Tav needs to spend in excess of this sum, and there have been
additional donation income that covers the overage, at that point
we'll need to re-vote to increase the budget limit.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------
Mobile security can be enabling, not merely restricting. Employees
who
bring their own devices (BYOD) to work are irked by the imposition of
MDM
restrictions. Mobile Device Manager Plus allows you to control only
the
apps on BYO-devices by containerizing them, leaving personal data
untouched!
https://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/304595813;131938128;j
_______________________________________________
Inkscape-devel mailing list
Inkscape-devel(a)lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/inkscape-devel
----- End forwarded message -----
-------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------
Mobile security can be enabling, not merely restricting. Employees
who
bring their own devices (BYOD) to work are irked by the imposition of
MDM
restrictions. Mobile Device Manager Plus allows you to control only
the
apps on BYO-devices by containerizing them, leaving personal data
untouched!
https://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/304595813;131938128;j
_______________________________________________
Inkscape-board mailing list
Inkscape-board(a)lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/inkscape-board
11:21 p.m.
New subject: [REFERENDUM] SVG Working Group Meetings for 2016
I vote a.
Cheers,
Josh
On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 9:21 AM, Bryce Harrington <bryce@...2...
wrote:
[Resending to the correct list this time... sheesh.]
----- Forwarded message from Bryce Harrington <bryce@...2...>
-----
Date: Sun, 15 May 2016 23:14:31 -0700
From: Bryce Harrington <bryce@...2...>
To: inkscape-devel@...5...
Subject: [Inkscape-devel] [REFERENDUM] SVG Working Group Meetings for 2016
A majority vote of the current board members is required for the
following matter.
Proposal:
Authorize SVG WG travel by Tav up to the amount in the SVG WG fund.
"Inkscape's Project Leadership committee authorizes Conservancy to pay
any invoice from Tav between 2016-03-01 and 2017-02-28 for SVG Working
Group meetings, up to the amount presently available in Inkscape's SVG
WG Fund, $2384.91. Tav must of course also comply with Conservancy's
travel policy."
[ ] a. Yes, authorize SVG WG expenses up to amount in fund
[ ] b. No, do not authorize these expenses
Votes:
Resolved:
Background:
In the past we've had to vote on each of Tav's meeting attendances on a
case by case basis. But now that we have set aside a fund specifically
for these meetings, I think we should just approve any and all travel he
may do, up to the total in that fund. This will eliminate uncertainty
for him in making his travel plans, and simplify our voting.
I enquired with Bradley Kuhn about how we can do this, and this is what
he replied:
<quote>
Bryce Harrington wrote:
> Tav attends these SVG WG meetings pretty routinely now, and I don't
> recall us ever not approving his attendance. Now that we have a
> dedicated fund set up for this, that isn't going to be used for
> anything *but* funding Tav's SVG WG trips, would it be permissible to
> give him approval to arrange his attendance at these meetings at his
> own discretion, so long as the expenses are within the limit of what's
> in the funding pool, without requiring board votes on each individual
> meeting?
I'd suggest you approve an annual maximum budget that Tav can send
invoices for regarding SVG meetings, and instruct Conservancy to pay
them provided Tav's within the Conservancy travel policy. That way, you
only have to think about it once per year, or when he goes over budget.
Something like:
"Inkscape's Project Leadership committee authorizes Conservancy to pay
any invoice from Tav between now and 2017-01-01 for SVG Working Group
meetings, up to a maximum 2016 Travel Budget for Tav's SVG Working
Group meetings of $Nk. Tav must of course also comply with
Conservancy's travel policy."
-- bkuhn
<endquote>
I aligned the dates to fiscal year 2016 since we decided to shift our
budget to those dates.
Below is a tally of the SVG WG fund balance as of what's in SFC's ledger
system for us:
---- FY 2015 ----
Initial fund $ 0
+ $2250.00 Budgeted from Inkscape General Fund 2015 $ 2250
- $ 346.82 SVG WG Sweden $ 1903.18
- $ 12.89 " " $ 1890.29
- $ 12.95 " " $ 1877.34
- $ 37.24 " " $ 1840.10
- $ 15.19 " " $ 1824.91
- $ 49.53 " " $ 1775.38
- $ 394.00 " " $ 1381.38
- $ 31.38 " " $ 1350.00
+ $2250.00 Retroactive from FY 2016 Ink. Gen. Fund $ 3600.00
- $ 12.99 SVG WG Sydney Feb 3-5 $ 3587.01
- $ 12.44 " " $ 3574.57
- $1586.80 " " $ 1987.77
- $ 15.55 " " $ 1972.22
- $ 11.67 " " $ 1960.55
- $ 244.29 " " $ 1716.26
- $ 68.89 " " $ 1647.37
---- FY 2016 ----
+ $ 736.54 Donation income Dec 2015 - May 2016 $ 2383.91
This will cover Tav's recent London SVG editor's meeting (which he
reports ran to about $500), an editor's meeting in Amsterdam, and other
travel he'll undertake through the remainder of FY 2016.
If Tav needs to spend in excess of this sum, and there have been
additional donation income that covers the overage, at that point
we'll need to re-vote to increase the budget limit.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mobile security can be enabling, not merely restricting. Employees who
bring their own devices (BYOD) to work are irked by the imposition of MDM
restrictions. Mobile Device Manager Plus allows you to control only the
apps on BYO-devices by containerizing them, leaving personal data
untouched!
https://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/304595813;131938128;j
_______________________________________________
Inkscape-devel mailing list
Inkscape-devel(a)lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/inkscape-devel
----- End forwarded message -----
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mobile security can be enabling, not merely restricting. Employees who
bring their own devices (BYOD) to work are irked by the imposition of MDM
restrictions. Mobile Device Manager Plus allows you to control only the
apps on BYO-devices by containerizing them, leaving personal data
untouched!
https://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/304595813;131938128;j
_______________________________________________
Inkscape-board mailing list
Inkscape-board(a)lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/inkscape-board
12:08 a.m.
New subject: [REFERENDUM] SVG Working Group Meetings for 2016
I'm a. of course too.
On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 09:21:58AM -0700, Bryce Harrington wrote:
[Resending to the correct list this time... sheesh.]
----- Forwarded message from Bryce Harrington <bryce@...2...> -----
Date: Sun, 15 May 2016 23:14:31 -0700
From: Bryce Harrington <bryce@...2...>
To: inkscape-devel@...5...
Subject: [Inkscape-devel] [REFERENDUM] SVG Working Group Meetings for 2016
A majority vote of the current board members is required for the
following matter.
Proposal:
Authorize SVG WG travel by Tav up to the amount in the SVG WG fund.
"Inkscape's Project Leadership committee authorizes Conservancy to pay
any invoice from Tav between 2016-03-01 and 2017-02-28 for SVG Working
Group meetings, up to the amount presently available in Inkscape's SVG
WG Fund, $2384.91. Tav must of course also comply with Conservancy's
travel policy."
[ ] a. Yes, authorize SVG WG expenses up to amount in fund
[ ] b. No, do not authorize these expenses
Votes:
Resolved:
Background:
In the past we've had to vote on each of Tav's meeting attendances on a
case by case basis. But now that we have set aside a fund specifically
for these meetings, I think we should just approve any and all travel he
may do, up to the total in that fund. This will eliminate uncertainty
for him in making his travel plans, and simplify our voting.
I enquired with Bradley Kuhn about how we can do this, and this is what
he replied:
<quote>
Bryce Harrington wrote:
> Tav attends these SVG WG meetings pretty routinely now, and I don't
> recall us ever not approving his attendance. Now that we have a
> dedicated fund set up for this, that isn't going to be used for
> anything *but* funding Tav's SVG WG trips, would it be permissible to
> give him approval to arrange his attendance at these meetings at his
> own discretion, so long as the expenses are within the limit of what's
> in the funding pool, without requiring board votes on each individual
> meeting?
I'd suggest you approve an annual maximum budget that Tav can send
invoices for regarding SVG meetings, and instruct Conservancy to pay
them provided Tav's within the Conservancy travel policy. That way, you
only have to think about it once per year, or when he goes over budget.
Something like:
"Inkscape's Project Leadership committee authorizes Conservancy to pay
any invoice from Tav between now and 2017-01-01 for SVG Working Group
meetings, up to a maximum 2016 Travel Budget for Tav's SVG Working
Group meetings of $Nk. Tav must of course also comply with
Conservancy's travel policy."
-- bkuhn
<endquote>
I aligned the dates to fiscal year 2016 since we decided to shift our
budget to those dates.
Below is a tally of the SVG WG fund balance as of what's in SFC's ledger
system for us:
---- FY 2015 ----
Initial fund $ 0
+ $2250.00 Budgeted from Inkscape General Fund 2015 $ 2250
- $ 346.82 SVG WG Sweden $ 1903.18
- $ 12.89 " " $ 1890.29
- $ 12.95 " " $ 1877.34
- $ 37.24 " " $ 1840.10
- $ 15.19 " " $ 1824.91
- $ 49.53 " " $ 1775.38
- $ 394.00 " " $ 1381.38
- $ 31.38 " " $ 1350.00
+ $2250.00 Retroactive from FY 2016 Ink. Gen. Fund $ 3600.00
- $ 12.99 SVG WG Sydney Feb 3-5 $ 3587.01
- $ 12.44 " " $ 3574.57
- $1586.80 " " $ 1987.77
- $ 15.55 " " $ 1972.22
- $ 11.67 " " $ 1960.55
- $ 244.29 " " $ 1716.26
- $ 68.89 " " $ 1647.37
---- FY 2016 ----
+ $ 736.54 Donation income Dec 2015 - May 2016 $ 2383.91
This will cover Tav's recent London SVG editor's meeting (which he
reports ran to about $500), an editor's meeting in Amsterdam, and other
travel he'll undertake through the remainder of FY 2016.
If Tav needs to spend in excess of this sum, and there have been
additional donation income that covers the overage, at that point
we'll need to re-vote to increase the budget limit.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mobile security can be enabling, not merely restricting. Employees who
bring their own devices (BYOD) to work are irked by the imposition of MDM
restrictions. Mobile Device Manager Plus allows you to control only the
apps on BYO-devices by containerizing them, leaving personal data untouched!
https://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/304595813;131938128;j
_______________________________________________
Inkscape-devel mailing list
Inkscape-devel(a)lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/inkscape-devel
----- End forwarded message -----
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mobile security can be enabling, not merely restricting. Employees who
bring their own devices (BYOD) to work are irked by the imposition of MDM
restrictions. Mobile Device Manager Plus allows you to control only the
apps on BYO-devices by containerizing them, leaving personal data untouched!
https://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/304595813;131938128;j
_______________________________________________
Inkscape-board mailing list
Inkscape-board(a)lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/inkscape-board
8:18 a.m.
Thanks for all your support. I recuse myself from the vote.
Tav
On Mon, 2016-05-16 at 17:08 -0700, Bryce Harrington wrote:
I'm a. of course too.
On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 09:21:58AM -0700, Bryce Harrington wrote:
>
> [Resending to the correct list this time... sheesh.]
>
> ----- Forwarded message from Bryce Harrington <bryce@...132...
> n.org> -----
>
> Date: Sun, 15 May 2016 23:14:31 -0700
> From: Bryce Harrington <bryce@...2...>
> To: inkscape-devel@...5...
> Subject: [Inkscape-devel] [REFERENDUM] SVG Working Group Meetings
> for 2016
>
> A majority vote of the current board members is required for the
> following matter.
>
> Proposal:
>
> Authorize SVG WG travel by Tav up to the amount in the SVG WG fund.
>
> "Inkscape's Project Leadership committee authorizes Conservancy to
> pay
> any invoice from Tav between 2016-03-01 and 2017-02-28 for SVG
> Working
> Group meetings, up to the amount presently available in Inkscape's
> SVG
> WG Fund, $2384.91. Tav must of course also comply with
> Conservancy's
> travel policy."
>
> [ ] a. Yes, authorize SVG WG expenses up to amount in fund
> [ ] b. No, do not authorize these expenses
>
> Votes:
>
>
> Resolved:
>
>
> Background:
>
> In the past we've had to vote on each of Tav's meeting attendances
> on a
> case by case basis. But now that we have set aside a fund
> specifically
> for these meetings, I think we should just approve any and all
> travel he
> may do, up to the total in that fund. This will eliminate
> uncertainty
> for him in making his travel plans, and simplify our voting.
>
> I enquired with Bradley Kuhn about how we can do this, and this is
> what
> he replied:
>
>
> <quote>
> Bryce Harrington wrote:
> >
> > Tav attends these SVG WG meetings pretty routinely now, and I
> > don't
> > recall us ever not approving his attendance. Now that we have a
> > dedicated fund set up for this, that isn't going to be used for
> > anything *but* funding Tav's SVG WG trips, would it be
> > permissible to
> > give him approval to arrange his attendance at these meetings at
> > his
> > own discretion, so long as the expenses are within the limit of
> > what's
> > in the funding pool, without requiring board votes on each
> > individual
> > meeting?
> I'd suggest you approve an annual maximum budget that Tav can send
> invoices for regarding SVG meetings, and instruct Conservancy to
> pay
> them provided Tav's within the Conservancy travel policy. That
> way, you
> only have to think about it once per year, or when he goes over
> budget.
> Something like:
>
> "Inkscape's Project Leadership committee authorizes Conservancy to
> pay
> any invoice from Tav between now and 2017-01-01 for SVG Working
> Group
> meetings, up to a maximum 2016 Travel Budget for Tav's SVG
> Working
> Group meetings of $Nk. Tav must of course also comply with
> Conservancy's travel policy."
>
> -- bkuhn
> <endquote>
>
>
> I aligned the dates to fiscal year 2016 since we decided to shift
> our
> budget to those dates.
>
> Below is a tally of the SVG WG fund balance as of what's in SFC's
> ledger
> system for us:
>
> ---- FY 2015 ----
> Initial fund $ 0
> + $2250.00 Budgeted from Inkscape General Fund 2015 $ 2250
> - $ 346.82 SVG WG Sweden $ 1903.18
> - $ 12.89 " " $ 1890.29
> - $ 12.95 " " $ 1877.34
> - $ 37.24 " " $ 1840.10
> - $ 15.19 " " $ 1824.91
> - $ 49.53 " " $ 1775.38
> - $ 394.00 " " $ 1381.38
> - $ 31.38 " " $ 1350.00
> + $2250.00 Retroactive from FY 2016 Ink. Gen. Fund $ 3600.00
> - $ 12.99 SVG WG Sydney Feb 3-5 $ 3587.01
> - $ 12.44 " " $ 3574.57
> - $1586.80 " " $ 1987.77
> - $ 15.55 " " $ 1972.22
> - $ 11.67 " " $ 1960.55
> - $ 244.29 " " $ 1716.26
> - $ 68.89 " " $ 1647.37
>
> ---- FY 2016 ----
> + $ 736.54 Donation income Dec 2015 - May 2016 $ 2383.91
>
> This will cover Tav's recent London SVG editor's meeting (which he
> reports ran to about $500), an editor's meeting in Amsterdam, and
> other
> travel he'll undertake through the remainder of FY 2016.
>
> If Tav needs to spend in excess of this sum, and there have been
> additional donation income that covers the overage, at that point
> we'll need to re-vote to increase the budget limit.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> -------------
> Mobile security can be enabling, not merely restricting. Employees
> who
> bring their own devices (BYOD) to work are irked by the imposition
> of MDM
> restrictions. Mobile Device Manager Plus allows you to control only
> the
> apps on BYO-devices by containerizing them, leaving personal data
> untouched!
> https://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/304595813;131938128;j
> _______________________________________________
> Inkscape-devel mailing list
> Inkscape-devel(a)lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/inkscape-devel
>
> ----- End forwarded message -----
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> -------------
> Mobile security can be enabling, not merely restricting. Employees
> who
> bring their own devices (BYOD) to work are irked by the imposition
> of MDM
> restrictions. Mobile Device Manager Plus allows you to control only
> the
> apps on BYO-devices by containerizing them, leaving personal data
> untouched!
> https://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/304595813;131938128;j
> _______________________________________________
> Inkscape-board mailing list
> Inkscape-board(a)lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/inkscape-board
-------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------
Mobile security can be enabling, not merely restricting. Employees
who
bring their own devices (BYOD) to work are irked by the imposition of
MDM
restrictions. Mobile Device Manager Plus allows you to control only
the
apps on BYO-devices by containerizing them, leaving personal data
untouched!
https://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/304595813;131938128;j
_______________________________________________
Inkscape-board mailing list
Inkscape-board(a)lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/inkscape-board
3:48 a.m.
New subject: [RESOLVED] SVG Working Group Meetings for 2016
Resolved:
Inkscape's Project Leadership committee authorizes Conservancy to pay
any invoice from Tav between 2016-03-01 and 2017-02-28 for SVG Working
Group meetings, up to the amount presently available in Inkscape's SVG
WG Fund, $2384.91. Tav must of course also comply with Conservancy's
travel policy.
Votes:
Bryce Harrington a
Josh Andler a
Tavmjong Bah (recused)
Jon A. Cruz a
Ted Gould a
Krzysztof Kosiński a
Martin Owens a
On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 09:21:58AM -0700, Bryce Harrington wrote:
[Resending to the correct list this time... sheesh.]
----- Forwarded message from Bryce Harrington <bryce@...2...> -----
Date: Sun, 15 May 2016 23:14:31 -0700
From: Bryce Harrington <bryce@...2...>
To: inkscape-devel@...5...
Subject: [Inkscape-devel] [REFERENDUM] SVG Working Group Meetings for 2016
A majority vote of the current board members is required for the
following matter.
Proposal:
Authorize SVG WG travel by Tav up to the amount in the SVG WG fund.
"Inkscape's Project Leadership committee authorizes Conservancy to pay
any invoice from Tav between 2016-03-01 and 2017-02-28 for SVG Working
Group meetings, up to the amount presently available in Inkscape's SVG
WG Fund, $2384.91. Tav must of course also comply with Conservancy's
travel policy."
[ ] a. Yes, authorize SVG WG expenses up to amount in fund
[ ] b. No, do not authorize these expenses
Votes:
Resolved:
Background:
In the past we've had to vote on each of Tav's meeting attendances on a
case by case basis. But now that we have set aside a fund specifically
for these meetings, I think we should just approve any and all travel he
may do, up to the total in that fund. This will eliminate uncertainty
for him in making his travel plans, and simplify our voting.
I enquired with Bradley Kuhn about how we can do this, and this is what
he replied:
<quote>
Bryce Harrington wrote:
> Tav attends these SVG WG meetings pretty routinely now, and I don't
> recall us ever not approving his attendance. Now that we have a
> dedicated fund set up for this, that isn't going to be used for
> anything *but* funding Tav's SVG WG trips, would it be permissible to
> give him approval to arrange his attendance at these meetings at his
> own discretion, so long as the expenses are within the limit of what's
> in the funding pool, without requiring board votes on each individual
> meeting?
I'd suggest you approve an annual maximum budget that Tav can send
invoices for regarding SVG meetings, and instruct Conservancy to pay
them provided Tav's within the Conservancy travel policy. That way, you
only have to think about it once per year, or when he goes over budget.
Something like:
"Inkscape's Project Leadership committee authorizes Conservancy to pay
any invoice from Tav between now and 2017-01-01 for SVG Working Group
meetings, up to a maximum 2016 Travel Budget for Tav's SVG Working
Group meetings of $Nk. Tav must of course also comply with
Conservancy's travel policy."
-- bkuhn
<endquote>
I aligned the dates to fiscal year 2016 since we decided to shift our
budget to those dates.
Below is a tally of the SVG WG fund balance as of what's in SFC's ledger
system for us:
---- FY 2015 ----
Initial fund $ 0
+ $2250.00 Budgeted from Inkscape General Fund 2015 $ 2250
- $ 346.82 SVG WG Sweden $ 1903.18
- $ 12.89 " " $ 1890.29
- $ 12.95 " " $ 1877.34
- $ 37.24 " " $ 1840.10
- $ 15.19 " " $ 1824.91
- $ 49.53 " " $ 1775.38
- $ 394.00 " " $ 1381.38
- $ 31.38 " " $ 1350.00
+ $2250.00 Retroactive from FY 2016 Ink. Gen. Fund $ 3600.00
- $ 12.99 SVG WG Sydney Feb 3-5 $ 3587.01
- $ 12.44 " " $ 3574.57
- $1586.80 " " $ 1987.77
- $ 15.55 " " $ 1972.22
- $ 11.67 " " $ 1960.55
- $ 244.29 " " $ 1716.26
- $ 68.89 " " $ 1647.37
---- FY 2016 ----
+ $ 736.54 Donation income Dec 2015 - May 2016 $ 2383.91
This will cover Tav's recent London SVG editor's meeting (which he
reports ran to about $500), an editor's meeting in Amsterdam, and other
travel he'll undertake through the remainder of FY 2016.
If Tav needs to spend in excess of this sum, and there have been
additional donation income that covers the overage, at that point
we'll need to re-vote to increase the budget limit.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mobile security can be enabling, not merely restricting. Employees who
bring their own devices (BYOD) to work are irked by the imposition of MDM
restrictions. Mobile Device Manager Plus allows you to control only the
apps on BYO-devices by containerizing them, leaving personal data untouched!
https://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/304595813;131938128;j
_______________________________________________
Inkscape-devel mailing list
Inkscape-devel(a)lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/inkscape-devel
----- End forwarded message -----
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mobile security can be enabling, not merely restricting. Employees who
bring their own devices (BYOD) to work are irked by the imposition of MDM
restrictions. Mobile Device Manager Plus allows you to control only the
apps on BYO-devices by containerizing them, leaving personal data untouched!
https://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/304595813;131938128;j
_______________________________________________
Inkscape-board mailing list
Inkscape-board(a)lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/inkscape-board
2690
days inactive
2693
days old
inkscape-board@lists.inkscape.org
7 comments
6 participants
participants (6)
-
Bryce Harrington -
Josh Andler -
Krzysztof Kosiński -
Martin Owens -
Tavmjong Bah -
Ted Gould