From Stephen Silver Fri May 23 14:17:15 2008
From: Stephen Silver
To: inkscape-devel@lists.inkscape.org
Subject: [Inkscape-devel]
and
Date: Fri, 23 May 2008 14:17:16 -0700
Message-ID: <742542.60038.qm@...1976...>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============6969239316754719947=="
--===============6969239316754719947==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
I'm currently working on making the title and description fields in the
Object Properties dialog work (bug 171024). SPObject already had some
dummy member functions to get and set titles and descriptions, so I've
turned these into working functions. But I see that there are also dummy
non-member functions that are supposed to do the same thing. I could
easily implement these using the member functions, but it seems like
pointless clutter to have both member functions and non-member functions
doing the same thing, so I'm tempted just to delete them (they are
not used anywhere, except in the macros SP_OBJECT_DESCRIPTION and
SP_OBJECT_TITLE, which are themselves unused). Is there any reason
to keep the non-member functions?
--
Stephen Silver
--===============6969239316754719947==--
From bulia byak Sat May 24 20:00:52 2008
From: bulia byak
To: inkscape-devel@lists.inkscape.org
Subject: Re: [Inkscape-devel] and
Date: Sun, 25 May 2008 00:00:59 -0300
Message-ID: <3c78ff030805242000q377a7f7dlc056e7a66d595254@...401...>
In-Reply-To: <742542.60038.qm@...1976...>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============4446954553380509560=="
--===============4446954553380509560==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 6:17 PM, Stephen Silver > SP_OBJECT_TITLE,
which are themselves unused). Is there any reason
> to keep the non-member functions?
I don't think - please feel free to purge them if they are indeed
unused. Thanks!
--
bulia byak
Inkscape. Draw Freely.
http://www.inkscape.org
--===============4446954553380509560==--