That sounds like a great plan to me, although I'd also like to see a robust testing infrastructure and full Gtk+ 3.x support in Inkscape 1.0. Shipping a 1.0 release with an "experimental" build option is asking for trouble!
AV
On 24 October 2013 14:34, Josh Andler <scislac@...400...> wrote:
That sounds like a solid compromise imho... especially if the cycle is dedicated to those two things and bug fixes (NO NEW FEATURES). As it would be possible to get a release out relatively fast if those were purely the focus. I'm pretty sure people who have problems with either of those would say they're "special release" worthy.
Cheers, Josh
On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 6:15 AM, Krzysztof Kosiński <tweenk.pl@...847...0...> wrote:
How about this:
- We rename Inkscape 0.49 to Inkscape 0.91
- In the next cycle, we actively work to address the two major bugs
(flowtext and coordinates) 3. When those are addressed, we release Inkscape 1.0
Regards, Krzysztof
October Webinars: Code for Performance Free Intel webinars can help you accelerate application performance. Explore tips for MPI, OpenMP, advanced profiling, and more. Get the most from the latest Intel processors and coprocessors. See abstracts and register > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=60135991&iu=/4140/ostg.clk... _______________________________________________ Inkscape-devel mailing list Inkscape-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/inkscape-devel
October Webinars: Code for Performance Free Intel webinars can help you accelerate application performance. Explore tips for MPI, OpenMP, advanced profiling, and more. Get the most from the latest Intel processors and coprocessors. See abstracts and register > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=60135991&iu=/4140/ostg.clk... _______________________________________________ Inkscape-devel mailing list Inkscape-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/inkscape-devel