Krzysztof,
Please know that anything Jon or Ted discuss is not as short sighted as you seem to think. I won't say that all ideas they have are perfect, but at the very least, they've probably put more thought into it than you're giving them credit for (and no offense, probably more time and thought than you have). I have to put forth that it seems like you are a little too quick with dismissing the input of others. Given that you have applied for SoC, I have to ask... will you be able to really take advice from a mentor as seriously as you should?
On Apr 1, 2009 5:58 PM, "Krzysztof Kosiński" <tweenk.pl@...400...> wrote:
Ted Gould wrote: > > I think that makes sense. One thing that I think would be interesting > for... We would have to roll back most of the C++ conversion in order to do that, and go back to plain GObject. I don't think that's possible.
I think the best solution would be to use SWIG (an automated binding generator). Jon suggested using XForms over DBus, but I think that's just too complicated to be feasible.
Regards, Krzysztof Kosiński -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/GSoC-Idea%3A-Inkscape-API-Improvement-tp22760803p22835... Sent from the Inkscape - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ___________________...