Am 10.01.2017 um 22:28 schrieb Olof Bjarnason:
[Side not: Features-wise I think MarkDown is enough no? It's got
links, lists, images, tables, code formatting, headers. What else does
the Inkscape wiki use?]
Well, you're right that we use the features that MediaWiki offers
out-of-the-box rather sparsely right now, but in my opinion we
should actually aim at changing that rather than to cut back on
features.
Even now I can think quickly think of quite a list of things that
would be missing from a Git*b Wiki:
- Image uploads (as far as i can see you have to upload the
files elsewhere first, e.g. in a repository)
- Templates
- Categories
- Redirects
- Even fundamental styling/layouting would be hard to impossible
(for beginners: try to re-create our main page [1] or our latest
release notes [2])
- Useful things like Namespaces (including user pages) /
Subpages
- Useful tools like they can be found on [3]
- Watchlists and the like (e.g. [4] which is immensely useful)
An probably a lot more I'm forgetting right now...
As I said before: We possibly could make do without all that, but
if there's any chance to stick with MediaWiki that would be my
obvious choice.
[1] http://wiki.inkscape.org/wiki/index.php/Inkscape
[2] http://wiki.inkscape.org/wiki/index.php/Release_notes/0.92
[3] http://wiki.inkscape.org/wiki/index.php/Special:SpecialPages
[4] http://wiki.inkscape.org/wiki/index.php/Special:RecentChanges