3 Dec
2004
3 Dec
'04
5:20 p.m.
Jon Phillips wrote:
Yeah, maybe the more important task at hand is to do what our mission says which is to be a SVG compliant editor. Maybe the more important thinking is that (and maybe we can loosely agree to this):
0.50 would be SVG Tiny (this is a general thinking overall thing)
1.0 would be full SVG 1.2 compliancy (both rendering and editing)
Hmmm... since the spec is still not even final, I'm wondering a bit about the 1.2 targeting for 1.0. Perhaps 1.0 might target full SVG 1.1 support, then have 1.5 or 2.0 embrace SVG 2.0.