12 Aug
2005
12 Aug
'05
1:52 a.m.
On 8/11/05, Bryce Harrington <bryce@...1...> wrote:
This is one reason (although not a great reason) for having distro-specific (or glibc-specific) rpms.
Sigh.
I'm not saying we shouldn't make distro-specific rpms if it's really necessary. But it still does not look like something normal and acceptable, to me.
I believe that it is possible to do a glibc detection as part of the rpm install; this may be a cleaner way of resolving the issue - just make the rpm fail to install if it's being installed against the wrong glibc.
Sounds like a good workaround. Anyone sufficiently RPM-savvy to set this up?
At least, can you tell me exactly which version(s) of glibc our static rpms require?
--
bulia byak
Inkscape. Draw Freely.
http://www.inkscape.org