30 Mar
2008
30 Mar
'08
8:43 p.m.
On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 11:56:18AM -0700, Jon A. Cruz wrote:
On Mar 30, 2008, at 5:29 AM, Peter Moulder wrote:
This looks like a legitimate bug: there shouldn't be a gpointer argument.
Btw, where does this source come from? I don't see this issue in gdl either v0.7.11 or svn head.
I think the main difference is that I'm setup to build with fewer warnings disabled.
When our codebase was 'dirtier' we needed to have only the worst showing, but now that things are cleaned up a lot it's probably a good idea to move on.
Given the 0.47 cleanup goals, would it make good sense to max up the warning levels, at least up until release time?
Bryce