10 Jul
2004
10 Jul
'04
12:11 p.m.
On Sat, 2004-07-10 at 11:45 +0200, Hongli Lai wrote:
I'm not sure which line exactly you're referring to.
I think we should ignore this one, memrchr isn't portable anyway. Thanks for fixing the other problems, I'll see if I can send an updated version of the code at some point (super busy right now with other stuff ...)