Do we have a reference point for SVN on any of these numbers?
On Sun, Mar 16, 2008 at 3:56 PM, Bryce Harrington <bryce@...1798...> wrote:
On Sat, Mar 15, 2008 at 04:46:47PM -0400, MenTaLguY wrote:
On Fri, 2008-03-14 at 23:49 -0700, Bryce Harrington wrote:
On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 09:35:55PM -0700, Ted Gould wrote:
On Fri, 2008-03-14 at 17:05 -0700, MenTaLguY wrote:
On Sat, 15 Mar 2008 00:21:47 +0100, jiho <jo.irisson@...400...>
wrote:
I'm not sure there's really a need to continue counting points
right
now. It seems bazaar is the clear winner. Is there someone with
a
strong opinion about that? Who's organising the switch? ;)
Well, first I think we need to do a trial import into bzr to make
sure
that performance is acceptable?
I don't know what you define there, but I was curious. So I
branched
the import (10 minutes) changed the changelog and pushed it into a private branch (35 minutes). Made another change to the changelog
and
pushed it (15 seconds). The whole repository is about 80 MB and my
DSL
is 768/128.
Any other metrics?
To give another data point, I branched ted's branch (6m15.4s),
modified
the Changelog, committed locally (13.1s), registered a new branch that anyone on the Inkscape-Admin team can commit to, and then pushed up
the
new branch (39m19.8s). A local commit to Changelog took 2.8s, and
push
took 15.4 sec (these are more representative of day-to-day work). I then proposed to merge into Ted's branch. This is with Comcast cablemodem with similar up/down rates as ted.
I also gave it a try on an account on one of the canonical.comservers. branch: 46s, commit: 4.2s. So network performance seems to be a large driver.
For me, with git, a remote clone took about 5 minutes, pushing to a new remote branch in the same remote repository took 4 seconds, pushing to a new remote branch in a fresh remote repository took about 6 minutes, the local commit took less than a second, and the subsequent push to an established remote branch took just over a second.
Just to make sure we're comparing apples to apples, would you mind also repeating the procedure with bzr, so we can rule out differences in network performance?
Bryce
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Inkscape-devel mailing list Inkscape-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/inkscape-devel