2010/4/6 Krzysztof Kosiński <tweenk.pl@...400...>:
W dniu 6 kwietnia 2010 15:33 użytkownik bulia byak <buliabyak@...400...> napisał:
This sounds inevitable, but rather hairy. Why have both inkscape:version and inkscape:document-version? Can you get what you need with inkscape:version only?
- Document version changes must be atomic, because the upgrade is
conducted only one time for each type of defect. This means inkscape:document-version (or inkscape:document-format) can change several times between two releases.
But why can't we just fix ALL the defects we find between 0.47 and 0.48 and have just two states of upgrade for <=0.47 and for >=0.48?
I recognize that introducing the backwards compatibility mechanism hastily and so late in the release cycle is a bad idea. I also believe this is the only way to really fix the remaining desktop coordinate system bugs. Therefore I must revert the coordinate system fixes :(. We'll look at this again after 0.48 is released.
OK, so let's make this release real fast then, so we can be back to development as soon as possible :)