On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 10:27 AM, Michael Nachtigal <chainsawchihuahua@...400...> wrote:
see two changes: First, that the scaling values the user enters should be more mathematically intuitive. For instance, downscaling should be achieved by entering a percentage 0 < p < 100, not a percentage p<0, as it stands now.
The problem is, if you allow it to specify 90%, that would mean 90% of the previous row/column size, not the original size. This way for example you will never be able to go down to zero size, because you will only approach zero asymptotically. The current display from 0% is not ideal also, but I think it makes this more clear.
to enlarge each clone by 195%! Secondly, when creating tiled clones the first clone always overlays the original, and that always gets in my way of adjusting the original. Why does it do that?
Not always. If you randomize positioning, it will not overlay the original.