26 Mar
2010
26 Mar
'10
11:05 p.m.
On Fri, 2010-03-26 at 23:49 +0100, Krzysztof Kosiński wrote:
The order of preference as of now is: TR1 (GCC) > Boost > __gnu_cxx::hash_map. I can change it to TR1 > __gnu_cxx > Boost, since it seems that the Boost implementation is worst.
I'd say that would be preferable then. I really only brought it up because I thought that Boost was the first it tried and stumbled across that comparison.
I definitely agree that it isn't worth it at this point to try a different implementation as we have way bigger performance issues in other places to be dealt with first.
Cheers, Josh