21 Oct
2012
21 Oct
'12
7:18 a.m.
On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 11:23 PM, Johan Engelen <jbc.engelen@...2592...> wrote:
The visual difference between miter and extrapolation is subtle, but the miter is almost always (very) ugly in my opinion. I find it very annoying to have to pay detailed attention to such ugliness (for which you may have to zoom in a bit) the whole time while modifying a path.
FWIW I also feel the difference between the desired rendering and fallback rendering should be clear enough so the user knows s/he hasn't really got an arc. My vote for bevel as fallback if tapered extrapolation is not possible (but why wouldn't it be?).
--
Shriramana Sharma