2013/5/31 Martin Owens <doctormo@...400...>
I'm more concerned with what it will be called in the user interface :-)
but what's the name of the algorithm? I couldn't find it in the paper.

I didn't find, but the paper homepage ( http://research.microsoft.com/en-us/um/people/kopf/pixelart/ ) has a bibtex reference sample and the key used to reference this paper is kopf2011.

2013/5/31 Sebastian Götte <jaseg@...233.....2974...>
On 05/31/2013 04:33 AM, Vinícius dos Santos Oliveira wrote:
> What do you guys think about use a more permissive license (LGPLv2.1 and
> later, MIT, ...) for the library?
If you are writing this from scratch and seperating this into an isolated library,
you could just dual-license it with a GPL variant and some sort of commercial license.

If I use a license compatible with GPL (like LGPL), there is no need to dual-license it.

Nobody seems to disapprove this idea, then I'll license it under LGPL, so other open source projects which use other licenses different than GPL might benefit from it.

Vinícius dos Santos Oliveira