On Thu, 04 Dec 2003 01:31:03 -0500 MenTaLguY <mental@...3...> wrote:
On Wed, 2003-12-03 at 05:32, Ian Grant wrote:
I was imagining the interface would be just that provided by gdome2 plus functions for rendering specified regions at specified scales.
This is obviously not what Mental is planning ... I presume there are good reasons why - it's just that they elude me :-)
Replacing the XML tree architecture that we inherited from Sodipodi with GDome would be a pretty major architectural change (it could substantially touch nearly every file in the tree).
Ah, this is what I did not appreciate. I had just assumed that inkscape/sodipodi used libxml, and that they would be using the libxml tree structure and therefore that gdome2 could be wedged in somehow. OK, I will shut up now until I've looked at the code. Sorry :-)