Yes, it may be that there is one close enough to just use in place of it as well. I'll let you know, and yes, narrow the fonts down a lot more beforehand.
Thanks for the input. :)

-C

On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 2:34 PM, Jabier Arraiza <jabier.arraiza@...2893...> wrote:
Thanks for the offer! Yes of couse!

In the same thing, TO ME the jump between the first step, whith a lot
of fonts, to the next set of fonts, become in lot of fonts not well
reviewed, some one better than the final one selected.

I think is better a first small set of fonts, you need your "artist"
side or we can create a group to select them.

Is a good idea give +1, but how mach people see carefuly all fonts in
the first seletion page you make?  A small set of fonts give a better
comparation betwen them. This selection could be better is tou can view
two fonts at the same time.

All the best, Jabier.


El mar, 29-09-2015 a las 13:45 +0100, C R escribió:
> Calluna Regular, which is currently in use on the website is a
> commercial font. While it's true that the regular version is offered
> under a free license, it is not offered under an OFL license, and
> what's a bit worse, is not licensed at all for use in documents, etc.
> (only desktop/web, and some sites want to sell a web license for it,
> which is worrying).
>
> So... heh.
>
> Anyone want me to work on finding alternatives for that one too?
> We pretty much need to.
>
> -C
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> ---------
> _______________________________________________
> Inkscape-devel mailing list
> Inkscape-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/inkscape-devel