24 Jun
2008
24 Jun
'08
3:11 p.m.
On Tue, 24 Jun 2008 11:43:09 -0300, "bulia byak" wrote:
Actually, how do you do your existing composition operators in PS? I guess it's something similar, i.e. duplicate-clip-repaint. Either that or rasterization.
Rasterization mostly.
But that doesn't make any sense for drawing something that's *not* *even* *there* anymore, (in the case that you've drawn something and then erased it again).
Seriously, I don't understand why "inversion" is an interesting operator at all. It's not too hard to construct a background on which your inverted objects are virtually impossible to see, right?
It still looks to me like an old-fashioned hack that made performance sense long ago, but doesn't anymore.
-Carl