28 Dec
2009
28 Dec
'09
11:09 p.m.
Regarding the subrevision issue, can someone confirm whether I'm understanding this correctly?
1. It is not possible to sensibly assign sequential revision numbers to all commits that result from a merge. Instead of this, Bazaar leaves the history of the branch that is being merged into alone, and groups all commits from the branch being merged as one "merge commit". 2. Arcadie merged trunk into his local branch, then pushed it to the trunk. All trunk commits that were made since he created his own branch got grouped into one "merge commit" (8857).
Is this correct?
Regards, Krzysztof