On Fri, 2017-01-27 at 21:18 -0800, Bryce Harrington wrote:
> That sounds frustrating.
>
> Can you explain in more detail what the issue was, so we know what to
> avoid?

It's about how the modifications are recorded as merges. Git has this
option of making the history all nice and flat, i.e. a rebase. I needed
to use it because Moini's commits had caused 90% of the history to be
doubled, basically making the repository broken.

So as long as you never ever have to touch the history once it's made,
it might be ok. But other git experts would be good.

Martin,