Bryce Harrington wrote:
> Fwiw, I think the only CC licenses which are GPL compatible are 'by' and
> 'by-sa'. The latter would be the preferred of the two. The others have
> restrictions making them incompatible with Inkscape's license.
>
> Bryce
>
> On Wed, Jan 23, 2008 at 08:59:36AM -0700, Josh Andler wrote:
>
>> He has changed the license to CC-NC
>>
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/>>
>> Does everyone find this to be sufficient?
>>
>> -Josh
>>
>>
>> Felipe Sanches wrote:
>>
>>> I have seen on the winner about screen metadata that it is marked as
>>> "proprietary". I can see no citation about free content licensing on
>>> its page at devianART and I also notice that there was no requirement
>>> for free content licensing on the contest rules.
>>>
>>> This could lead to problems on packaging for debian and other
>>> gnu/linux distributions that have strict rules about licensing.
>>> I think that we should add this requirement on the next contest. We
>>> should also verify which license does needcoffee intend to use on his
>>> work (same is true for the #2) and update the SVG metadata.
>>>
>>> Juca
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
>>> Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
>>>
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Inkscape-devel mailing list
>>>
Inkscape-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>>>
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/inkscape-devel>>>
>>>