Hi Alex,
Are there any features in Gtk 3.24 that we need that would limit our Linux deployments for 1.1
And, are we planning on 1.1 being a non-stable release? I didn't know we had an LTS strategy (or even what 'support' or 'long term' means in the context of an all-volunteer project like Inkscape).
Best Regards, Martin Owens
On Wed, 2020-06-10 at 12:33 +0100, Alex Valavanis wrote:
Hi All,
I just wanted to follow up a couple of recent discussions on our build dependencies.
- There was some talk of moving to C++17. Tav - I think you were
going ahead with a dependency bump in master? Are we still doing this, or did we find any issues?
- Are we OK to bump to Gtk+ 3.24? AFAIK this is the final Gtk+ 3
version so would be a good stable target for Inkscape 1.1. The only issue would be RHEL/CentOS/Debian LTS are stuck on an older version. My feeling about this kind of thing is that we keep Inkscape 1.0.* as our LTS and push ahead with a dependency bump in master.
Best wishes,
Alex _______________________________________________ Inkscape Devel mailing list -- inkscape-devel@lists.inkscape.org To unsubscribe send an email to inkscape-devel-leave@lists.inkscape.org