Maximilian Albert wrote:
bulia byak schrieb:
Speaking of which... we have a disproportionate amount of bug reports on the linked offset and dynamic offset features. They predate LPEs, have many issues, and are ripe for conversion. Anyone feels like reimplementing them via LPEs and 2geom (instead of a separate SPObject and livarot) so that the old code could be dropped?
It would be a fantastic opportunity to do this in the context of my proposal. Playing with linked offset yesterday, I found its UI to be precisely the kind that would be needed for many of the geometric constructions. So I would work on integrating this with LPEs anyway. Then I can just as well replace the old offset code and reimplement it using 2geom (which has great support for offsetting paths, AFAICT from the corresponding toy). Awesome. :)
This gives you major refactoring kudos in my book. :-)
Aaron Spike