On Thu, Sep 22, 2005 at 10:39:32PM -0400, MenTaLguY wrote:
On Thu, 2005-09-22 at 17:53 -0700, Bryce Harrington wrote:
SVG Tiny is a good idea. I think previously we identified SVG Tiny compliance as our condition to releasing Inkscape 1.00.
What do others think? What if we restructured the roadmap to enable us to attack and achieve this objective?
I don't think it's sufficient for Inkscape 1.
Why's that?
However, I do think it is a very good idea for our next major goal.
Okay, great, if we can get a few more ayes, I'll look into how to restructure the roadmap to help us do this. I suppose we'd want to just identify what features need to be implemented, and sort them in some fashion, and plan to knock out one or two per release until we get there.
Bryce