18 Dec
2004
18 Dec
'04
11:44 p.m.
On Sat, 18 Dec 2004 17:17:11 -0600, Bob Jamison <rwjj@...127...> wrote:
This is good, since we need to address the mixing of namespaces, like embedding SVG in XHTML.
Embedding is not a problem with the current scheme. If you have <svg> with xmlns= attribute setting the SVG namespace, it is the default for it and all its descendants. Ancestors of <svg> may have different default namespaces, it's all perfectly legal. See
http://w3c.org/TR/REC-xml-names/
for details.
Mozilla SVG uses this prefix already.
It does not matter what prefixes, if any, are used. What matters is that our SVG elements are in the namespace "http://www.w3.org/2000/svg", and our files satisfy this requirement. I don't see any need to change anything.