I&#39;m still unclear on the reason why we need to do this? bobs build tool works great...<div>Whats the improvement moving from that to cmake? the only reason we have 3 is cos people are playing with cmake,</div><div><br>
<br><div class="gmail_quote">2008/12/29 Krzysztof Kosiński <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a href="mailto:tweenk.pl@...400...">tweenk.pl@...400...</a>&gt;</span><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
<br>
This was raised in another thread, but I think this issue is fairly important<br>
- what is the status of CMake? Having three parallel build systems (homebrew<br>
buildtool, autotools and CMake) is at least awkward. I understand that<br>
migrating to CMake would allow us to remove the Windows build system. On the<br>
other hand, figuring out how to compile Inkscape on Windows using MinGW and<br>
MSYS would do the same.<br>
<br>
Regards, Krzysztof Kosiński<br>
--<br>
View this message in context: <a href="http://www.nabble.com/CMake-status-tp21209331p21209331.html" target="_blank">http://www.nabble.com/CMake-status-tp21209331p21209331.html</a><br>
Sent from the Inkscape - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.<br>
<br>
<br>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Inkscape-devel mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Inkscape-devel@lists.sourceforge.net">Inkscape-devel@lists.sourceforge.net</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/inkscape-devel" target="_blank">https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/inkscape-devel</a><br>
</blockquote></div><br></div>