On Sun, 2008-03-16 at 12:56 -0700, Bryce Harrington wrote:
For me, with git, a remote clone took about 5 minutes, pushing to a new remote branch in the same remote repository took 4 seconds, pushing to a new remote branch in a fresh remote repository took about 6 minutes, the local commit took less than a second, and the subsequent push to an established remote branch took just over a second.
Just to make sure we're comparing apples to apples, would you mind also repeating the procedure with bzr, so we can rule out differences in network performance?
I get 5 minutes for branch, 17 minutes for remote push to a new branch, 4 seconds for commit, and 10 seconds for a push to an existing remote branch.
The 17 minutes is a bit more livable, but I do wonder -- shouldn't there be some way to have bzr branches hosted in the same location share revision data, so you don't need to copy so much around?
-mental