On Fri, 2017-02-10 at 21:09 -0700, brynn wrote:
It's just that if there's no author shown anywhere, how will people know whose thoughts those are. Even now, I'm not clear if it's Bryce or Martin.
Or changing the title could help to indicate this is one person's thoughts. Bryce's 2017 Development Plan, for example.
This News item sort of diverges from most articles, which are written towards the user community. This one is more addressed to developers. I'm not saying it's good or bad. Just noting how different it is.
In a way I feel like having a few more development related articles shows users that we're working on actual code, not just releases but actively doing things.
It's nice to know we're a project in action. :-)
This plan can be voted on by developers if we feel strongly about having checkboxes checked. But without other developers speaking up to break the consensus (or in this case silent consensus) there's no benefit to going down the rabbit hole. Bryce's ideas are good and I'd stand by them as a project direction for which the whole project could voice as the plan.
Do other developers want to add to the plan or bring up a concern?
Best Regards, Martin Owens