On Fri, 2010-07-02 at 01:47 -0700, Joshua A. Andler wrote:
On Fri, 2010-07-02 at 01:36 -0700, Jon Cruz wrote:
On Jul 1, 2010, at 8:33 PM, ~suv wrote:
On 2/7/10 04:42, Chris Morgan wrote:
On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 12:30 PM, Joshua A. Andler <scislac@...400...> wrote:
My res is 1680x1050 (16:10), prefer that bar up top personally.
I'm also at 1680x1050, and prefer the command bar up the top (or hidden - I absolutely never use it; can I hide it?). As for the snap bar, I've got used to that on the right now and prefer it there, I think, as it balances the tool bar on the left.
1440 x 900 (MBP), defaults to 'View > Wide'
Quite interesting. So we have a general response from several people, all who happen to report a 1.6 ratio and don't feel they're quite "wide" yet.
For me, it's not a matter of "feeling wide"... it's a matter of having enough vertical space to not need/desire that bar on the side. However, having the snapping bar on the side feels better for me personally.
I have a 1920 x 1200 laptop screen.
For me, any advantage of having the command bar on the side is immediately lost as soon as I have a docked dialog.
I also think that "Default" should mean default. This is important from a documentation point of view.
On a related note, now that the Text toolbar has been GtkAction-a-fied, I find that the new window size to be a bit small. (The width of the non-GtkAction-a-fied bar limited how narrow the window could be.)
Tav