On Mar 30, 2008, at 5:29 AM, Peter Moulder wrote:

This looks like a legitimate bug: there shouldn't be a gpointer

argument.

Btw, where does this source come from?  I don't see this issue in

gdl either v0.7.11 or svn head.

I think the main difference is that I'm setup to build with fewer warnings disabled.

When our codebase was 'dirtier' we needed to have only the worst showing, but now that things are cleaned up a lot it's probably a good idea to move on.

In general the best working solution I've seen is an iterative process where code is cleaned up to generate zero warnings, then bump the settings up to show a few more. Even in the Inkscape sources I've seen things where for a given 'annoying' warning, there are a few legitimate bugs hiding that need to be fixed.