18 Oct
2013
18 Oct
'13
3:53 p.m.
2013/10/18 Alexandre Prokoudine <alexandre.prokoudine@...400...>:
How is it even remotely date based?
2014.0 - now that is date based. 2014.2 - obviously incremental release with less changes. 2015.0 - brand new release again.
So no, I don't get our point :)
My example was not date-based, I just wanted to illustrate something which is not possible in a strictly date-based scheme.
Your proposed scheme is actually a hybrid. I thought that by "date-based" we mean something like Ubuntu versioning: YY.MM, not YYYY.V where V is the minor version number.
Regards, Krzysztof