22 Dec
2010
22 Dec
'10
4:22 p.m.
Hi,
many thanks to ~suv for the workaround and to Jon for the quick fix. Works fine now.
Cheers, Max
2010/12/21 Jon Cruz <jon@...18...>:
On Dec 21, 2010, at 10:53 AM, Jon Cruz wrote:
It's not an issue with the type itself. The calls that use it are all marked as "Since 2.6", and I'm pretty sure that 2.24.1 is newer than 2.6.
I just need to pinpoint an extra <include> to add.
Figured it out. The documentation lied, and that type was added post 2.24.
Fix is in as of revision 9972.