Hi Johan!
Nice! Recursive skeleton and VonKoch are very similar. Maybe there is a way to fuse them?
The main difference between the two is that vonkoch uses (linear) transforms while recursive skeleton uses "pattern along path"-like deformations.
Minor differencies are that in VonKoch, I did separate the path to be transformed (deformed in your case) from the path defining the transforms (deforms) to be applied recursively, and I also added a complexity bound because it grows exponentially with the number of generations and can easily freeze inkscape.
I think we could have a check box to allow path-deform instead of just transforms.
Hm. Dunno. What do you think?
(anyway, feel free to experiment/modify vonkoch to your needs if you feel it's worth! ;-)
jfb.
2009/4/12
<J.B.C.Engelen@...1578...>
Hi all,
Inspired by Hofstadter's GEB, I made a new LPE called "recursive
skeleton" (for want of a better name !!!!!!).
It takes the original path, and puts it along the parts of the original
path.
Original path:
_________ _________
Parts are:
_________
and
_________
Result of one iteration:
___ ___ ___ ___
Two iterations:
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
I hope this makes it a bit clear. Find a more interesting example here:
http://smi.el.utwente.nl/~johan/recursive_skeleton.png
The LPE is still experimental, have a go at it and see if it makes sense
to you, would love to hear comments :)
Ciao,
Johan
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by:
High Quality Requirements in a Collaborative Environment.
Download a free trial of Rational Requirements Composer Now!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/www-ibm-com
_______________________________________________
Lib2geom-devel mailing list
Lib2geom-devel@...1794...s.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lib2geom-devel