I think that when you said "commercial" you actually meant
"proprietary" (not libre)...

Yes, that's what I meant, thanks for the correction.

Even though it may sound like a minor detail, I stress that because
libre fonts can very easily have a commercial aspect (i.e. type
designers being paid to improve them) without affecting their freedom
aspects.

I agree. I'll be more careful in the future. :) It was not lack of knowing, it was being in too much of a rush.

Thanks again for the correction.

On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 9:45 AM, C R <cajhne@...400...> wrote:
> Calluna Regular, which is currently in use on the website is a commercial
> font. While it's true that the regular version is offered under a free
> license, it is not offered under an OFL license, and what's a bit worse, is
> not licensed at all for use in documents, etc. (only desktop/web, and some
> sites want to sell a web license for it, which is worrying).
>
> So... heh.
>
> Anyone want me to work on finding alternatives for that one too?
> We pretty much need to.
>
> -C
>

> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------

>
> _______________________________________________
> Inkscape-devel mailing list
> Inkscape-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/inkscape-devel
>