He was willing to go public domain or gpl, he doesn't care really. But Felipe said that GPL wasn't appropriate. And CC was mentioned, so he picked one. Would we prefer public domain or by-sa CC?
-Josh
Bryce Harrington wrote:
Fwiw, I think the only CC licenses which are GPL compatible are 'by' and 'by-sa'. The latter would be the preferred of the two. The others have restrictions making them incompatible with Inkscape's license.
Bryce
On Wed, Jan 23, 2008 at 08:59:36AM -0700, Josh Andler wrote:
He has changed the license to CC-NC http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/
Does everyone find this to be sufficient?
-Josh
Felipe Sanches wrote:
I have seen on the winner about screen metadata that it is marked as "proprietary". I can see no citation about free content licensing on its page at devianART and I also notice that there was no requirement for free content licensing on the contest rules.
This could lead to problems on packaging for debian and other gnu/linux distributions that have strict rules about licensing. I think that we should add this requirement on the next contest. We should also verify which license does needcoffee intend to use on his work (same is true for the #2) and update the SVG metadata.
Juca
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
Inkscape-devel mailing list Inkscape-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/inkscape-devel