Just one thing for clarification:
0.91.x is cancelled then, right?

Just so we can stop wasting effort on an inactive branch...

Regards, 
Eduard

Am 5. Mai 2016 9:32:47 vorm. schrieb Josh Andler <scislac@...400...>:

0.91 was the first time we had an experimental branch, but I'm not against it again.

I would also like to hear from Jabier if he thinks something is a review away from inclusion this cycle or if he thinks it's better to defer his branches for 0.92.

Cheers,
Josh

On May 5, 2016 12:15 AM, "Alex Valavanis" <valavanisalex@...400...> wrote:

OK, this all sounds very promising.  Unfortunately, I won't be
available to join in the IRC meeting tomorrow, but by the sounds of
things, we're not awaiting any new urgent feature additions.  Can I
suggest, therefore, that we move into Feature Freeze as soon as
possible, and concentrate on bug fixing ready for release?  As in
previous cycles, we could start an experimental branch for features
that can wait until after 0.92.

AV

On 5 May 2016 at 07:59, Josh Andler <scislac@...400...> wrote:
> I've worked with SUV for the past half dozen years or so on figuring out
> release blocker stuff. I'm willing to take it on even if there is no
> interest on SUV's end to help determine such things. I will draft a release
> plan tomorrow morning (as I had previously offered to) and send it to you
> Bryce for your review and edits and I will begin reviewing for blocker bugs
> in the tracker after that.
>
> Cheers,
> Josh
>
> On May 4, 2016 9:08 PM, "Bryce Harrington" <bryce@...961...>
> wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, May 04, 2016 at 03:57:51PM +0200, Tavmjong Bah wrote:
>> > On Wed, 2016-05-04 at 09:04 -0400, Martin Owens wrote:
>> > > On Wed, 2016-05-04 at 14:27 +0200, Tavmjong Bah wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > We should discuss this on Friday's IRC meeting.
>> > > Friday's meeting is a board meeting isn't it? I thought developer
>> > > decisions like releases were more developer consensus on mailing list
>> > > type things and less board responsibility.
>> > >
>> > > (or is this just convenient discussion space?)
>> >
>> > Yes, it is not the board's duty to make developer decisions. But I
>> > think the board does have the responsibility to aid (and prod) the
>> > developers to make decisions when needed as well as to support the
>> > execution of those decisions (e.g. fund a dedicated hackfest).
>> >
>> > (it is also a convenient discussion space)
>>
>> You're both right, and I do agree that having a meeting to get things
>> going with the release is a great idea.
>>
>> Traditionally we've often encouraged non-board-specific technical
>> discussions to happen immediately following the board meeting.  What if
>> we had a short board meeting for say 20-30 min, and then a second
>> followup meeting specifically to focus on release coordination
>> discussions?
>>
>> Sounds like we've crested the hill on the cmake work (we still need to
>> do a comparison between the automake-generated dist and the cmake dist,
>> to see if we're missing anything important).  Once we're comfortable
>> with what's in the dist, I can cut an alpha release - possibly as early
>> as this weekend.  I'm prepared to do a series of (bi-weekly?)
>> pre-releases as we work towards the final release.  Next step would be
>> to start gathering a list of release blockers and recruit owners for
>> getting those items examined; I would love it if someone could volunteer
>> to coordinate/manage the release blocker bugfixing work.
>>
>> Bryce
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Find and fix application performance issues faster with Applications
>> Manager
>> Applications Manager provides deep performance insights into multiple
>> tiers of
>> your business applications. It resolves application problems quickly and
>> reduces your MTTR. Get your free trial!
>> https://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/302982198;130105516;z
>> _______________________________________________
>> Inkscape-devel mailing list
>> Inkscape-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/inkscape-devel
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Find and fix application performance issues faster with Applications Manager
> Applications Manager provides deep performance insights into multiple tiers
> of
> your business applications. It resolves application problems quickly and
> reduces your MTTR. Get your free trial!
> https://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/302982198;130105516;z
> _______________________________________________
> Inkscape-devel mailing list
> Inkscape-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/inkscape-devel
>

---

Find and fix application performance issues faster with Applications Manager
Applications Manager provides deep performance insights into multiple tiers of
your business applications. It resolves application problems quickly and
reduces your MTTR. Get your free trial!
https://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/302982198;130105516;z
_______________________________________________
Inkscape-devel mailing list
Inkscape-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/inkscape-devel