On Sun, Jan 29, 2017 at 02:03:36PM +0100, Christoffer Holmstedt wrote:
2017-01-28 23:38 GMT+01:00 Bryce Harrington <bryce@...961...>:
On Sat, Jan 28, 2017 at 04:12:29PM +0100, Tobias Ellinghaus wrote:
Am Samstag, 28. Januar 2017, 09:21:02 CET schrieb Martin Owens:
[...]
No, the history needed to be rewritten because Maren had a bad email address that could exist on yahoo but which didn't. So it changed, but in doing so it interacted with origin and duplicated the history instead of over-writing it.
That poses two questions:
Why do you care what old email address there is in commit info?
Provided you care, do you know about .mailmap?
fix-authors-list-in-git/
[...]
Yep, thanks, I was going to suggest considering .mailmap for needs like this.
Anyway, so my question is should the bzr->git be redone or is the inkscape_web on gitlab now okay? (If there are still any problems, it's going to be easier to redo things sooner rather than later I'm betting.)
Bryce
Best Regards, Martin Owens
Tobias
From my point of view inkscape-web [1] looks okay, the discussion is more
of a "lessons learned" before the inkscape source code is migrated.
[1] https://gitlab.com/inkscape/inkscape-web/network/master
-- Christoffer Holmstedt
Okay, great, I hadn't noticed problems on a cursory look at the history, but wasn't sure if I was missing something.
I recall you've spoken of using lp2gh; have you or do you know if anyone's recently tried a testrun of it against the Inkscape codebase itself? Would be nice to know of any potential troublespots that we could start looking into.
Thanks, Bryce