
25 Aug
2005
25 Aug
'05
5:21 p.m.
On Thu, 2005-08-25 at 12:49 -0400, Greg Steffensen wrote:
I've mentioned it to Greg, and I still believe, that perhaps his application would work better separately from Inkscape instead of being an extension. Such that you could run them side by side, and then drag and drop files into Inkscape. This would also allow it to be used with other applications in a similar way. I think that is probably a stronger paradigm for using it. I think also, from the marketing perspective, making it "OCAL Browser" is better than "The Inkscape Extension for OCAL". This way it can be made to work with applications like Illustrator and promote OCAL.
This sounds like a good idea, and requires minimal changes to the code. But I'm theoretically working on this for Inkscape, as far as Google is concerned. Would a stronger separation from Inkscape be tolerable?
I think its one of those things that we define, and if this is the best solution, then this is the solution :)
I think the most important part is to basically just get interoperability down.
So, then my question is where to host the code? Should it be a new project on the sf.net inkscape page, or now under Open Clip Art Library's CVS?
Thoughts?
Jon
--
Jon Phillips
San Francisco, CA
USA PH 510.499.0894
jon@...235...
http://www.rejon.org
MSN, AIM, Yahoo Chat: kidproto
Jabber Chat: rejon@...896...
IRC: rejon@...897...
Inkscape (http://inkscape.org)
Open Clip Art Library (www.openclipart.org)