J.B.C.Engelen@...1578... wrote:
-----Original Message----- From: MenTaLguY [mailto:mental@...3...] ... On Mon, 17 Mar 2008 18:05:51 +0100, J.B.C.Engelen@...1578... wrote:
Although I can't help you now on the reversal issue, I want
to place a
comment: Why not eliminate them in favor of 2Geom's points and matrices ? Is the change NRPoint => NR::Point so tiny?
That appears to be what he's doing.
I'm sorry, I'm confused by your comment mental. What were you referring to? I meant "is the change NRPoint => NR::Point so tiny, that it is very easy etc etc and to 2geom would be more difficult so will just convert to NR::Point"
More like the other way around, NR::Point => Geom::Point (and similarly for Matrix and friends) shouldn't be that hard (they're very, very similar), but I thought I'd first eliminate the old NR structures.